Close Please enter your Username and Password


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1771 posts
6/8/2022 5:09 am
THIS A LONG READ, IT TELLS THE FAILURES OF THE CAP POLICE LEADING UP TO JAN62021


READ THIS ALL CLOSELY. THIS IS WHY THE JAN 6 INCIDENT WAS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN. SANCTIONED BY NANCY PELOSI.

Internal Capitol Police review found sweeping intelligence, security failures on Pelosi's watch
Secret after-action report cited widespread ineptitude and inadequate riot squads, found closing of open-source intelligence unit may have contributed to tragedy.

Capitol Police compiled a secret after-action review months after the Jan. 6 riots that identified sweeping blunders by the department ranging from delayed deployment of specialized civil disturbance units to the fateful dismantling of an intelligence unit that monitored social media for threats.

Identifying 53 areas of failure needing corrective action, the June 4, 2021 report, obtained by Just the News, produces a far more stark portrait of leadership failures than those offered by Democrat-led investigations, making abundantly clear that the Capitol Police under House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were ill-equipped to defend one of America's most symbolic and high-value institutions two decades after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Specifically, the report stated that some Capitol Police leaders had received intelligence from outside sources like the FBI warning of the strong potential for violence, including the targeting of lawmakers, on the day Congress certified the 2020 election, but those warnings were not properly distilled into the operational plan given to front-line commanders or highlighted in the summary section known as the "Bottom Line Up Front."

The assessment for 1/6 contained a BLUF that did not express the severity of the threat or the fact that USCP actually had knowledge of a plan in place," according to the report. "The statement that protesters may be armed was included, but it was never expressed with the urgency that they planned to overtake the Capitol and target Members of Congress."

Instead of clear warnings to its forces, Capitol Police leaders put "a generic, all-encompassing quote" in the operational plan that was too vague to convey the true threat level, the report said.

That intelligence failure was exacerbated, the review concluded, when new department leadership installed after Pelosi became Speaker decided to dismantle the department's open-source intelligence unit that scanned for threats on social media.

The lost window into the overt discussion of violence on social media prior to Jan. 6 may have contributed to the tragedy by further blinding commanders and officers to the potential for serious violence, the report.

"Individuals with the most experience extrapolating open-source material were not tasked with reviewing social media to glean intel related to the event," the report stated.

"The social media unit was immediately and essentially dismantled under the new leadership,” it added. "New office reassignments and steering away from the concepts of having subject matter experts may have contributed to the tragedy."

You can read the full report here:

File
USCP-Jan6AfterActionReportandRecommendations6-4-21.pdf

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1738 posts
6/8/2022 5:10 am

THIS IS ONLY HALF OF THE ARTICLE.

READ ALL AT "JUST THE NEWS "

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1738 posts
6/8/2022 9:39 pm

    Quoting dusty17:
    Yeah Hank, Trump called the cops on himself ..................... (cops = National Guard) ....
dusty, try not to hate when u failing, trump had been advised there would be a big crowd for his speech, he asked that the national guard be called up on stand by, but nancy refused, yes trump is president, and NANCY PELOSI HAS CONTROL OVER THE SECURITY OF THE CAPITAL, WHICH INCLUDE THE CAPITAL POLICE. SHE HAS TO APPROVE ANY CHANGES OR ADDITIONS, AKA, CALLING UP NATIONAL GUARD, TRUMP CAN'T DO THIS NOR CAN ANY PRESIDENT

DUDE U HATE TRUMP AND US SO BAD U AREGRASPING AT STRAWS

TRY READING WHO IS WHO REGARDING SECURITY IN DC

ALSO, I BLOGGED B4 THAT THE FBI HAD RECEIVED INTEL THERE WAS GOING TO BE PROUD BOYS ETC THEY DID NOTHING. PLEASE TRY TO GET THINGS RIGHT ONE TIEM

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1738 posts
6/9/2022 12:06 pm

    Quoting dusty17:
    A couple things Hank ...

    First off, Trump invited the 'proud boys .. in fact Trump BEGGED the proud boys. Quote Trump in the Biden debate, "Proud boys stand back and Stand by".

    Another thing, the President of the United States doesn't REQUEST a Military Action, HE ORDERS IT. PERIOD.

    And if his orders aren't carried out there would be hell to pay as in court-martial etc. etc. ... you know it... I know it ... the birds crappen on your car know it!
dusty u hate, so bad u cant take time to read facts. NO PRESIDENT CAN ORDER THING IN DC. DC IS NOT A STATE. SECURITY IS CONTROLED THERE BY MAYOR BOOZER AN PELOSI

I POSTED A BLOG SHOWING THAT 4 DAYS PRIOR TO JAN 6 EXTRA SECURITY WAS REQUESTED. BUT REFUSED. READ IT!!!!

U CANT LET GO AN ADMIT U AN OTHERS HATE TRUMP N US THAT SUPPORT HM SO BAD YOU REFUSED TO FACE THE POSTED FACT THAT SHOWS U R WRONG

WHY NOT BRAG ON HOW WELL BIDEN IS DOING. TELL US HOW MUCH BETTER WE ARE. HOW LOW PRICES ARE FOR BASICS. HOW WELL INFLATION IS BEING HANDLED.

YOUR ID, UR LEAF ID, KOFFLA, TX ID, CRICKET ID. ALL HAVE NOTHING TO ADD HERE BUT HATE OF A PRESIDENT NO LONGER IN OFFICE, AKA 15MONTHS

TELL US WHAT WILL U ALL DO AFTER NOV 2022 N NOV 24.

STILL HATE TRUMP AS AN EXCUSE FOR UR FAILURES THEN.

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1738 posts
6/9/2022 10:08 pm

    Quoting dusty17:
    Hank, I'm pretty sure it's still illegal to lie to Congress at an Impeachment Hearing .. eh ... ya think?

    Trump's lawyers didn't touch this bull shit with a ten-foot pole ... drama queens Jordan and Nunez didn't either ... and Trump could have showed up with THE PROOF that he summoned the National Guard to the Capitol on the morning of Jan 6th.

    None of it happened because it's a lie made for television and radio, where lying is legal ... and it was made for an audience that will believe anything.
HE DOESN'T NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING.

SORRY FOR THE LONG READ. FACTS SOMETIMES COME IN LENGTHY ARTICLES.

ALWAYS GLAD TO HELP. TELL UR BOY? KOFFLA ABOUT THIS. HE MAY LEAVE SOONER HAHAHAHAH

File
BowserDODLetterJan52021.pdf

Bowser wrote in her Jan. 5, 2021 letter that the earlier episode "caused confusion" and could have become "a national security threat with no way for MPD and federal law enforcement to decipher armed groups."

"To be clear, the District of Columbia is not requesting other federal law enforcement personnel and discourages any additional deployment without immediate notification to and consultation with MPD, if such plans are underway," Bowser wrote, adding she believed her police department was "well trained and prepared to lead the way" to ensure Jan. 6 unfolded safely.

In the end, that did not happen. Capitol and D.C. police were overrun by rioters, and the Guard wasn't deployed until after violence spiraled out of control, causing a mad scramble to send troops that had been offered and rejected days earlier, the records show.

The evening before Jan. 6, the FBI's Norfolk, Va., office sent an explicitl warning to some high-ranking officials in the Capitol Police that there was new intelligence that some planned attendees were thinking of storming the Capitol and targeting lawmakers for violence.

Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows
Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began

The Pentagon first raised the possibility of sending National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol four days before the Jan. 6 riots, setting in motion a series of rejections by Capitol Police and Democrats that left Congress vulnerable as threats of violence were rising, according to government memos that validate Trump administration officials' long-held claims.

An official timeline of the Jan. 6 tragedy assembled by Capitol Police shows that a Defense Department official reached out to a Capitol Police deputy chief, Sean Gallagher, on Jan. 2, 2021 to see if a request for troops was forthcoming, but the offer was quickly rejected after a consultation with then-Chief Steve Sund.

"Carol Corbin (DOD) texts USCP Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher, Protective Service Bureau, to determine whether USCP is considering a request for National Guard soldiers for January 6, 2021 event," the timeline reads in the lone entry listed for Saturday, Jan. 2, 2021.

The following morning, the timeline states, "Gallagher replies to DOD via text that a request for National Guard support not forthcoming at this time after consultation with COP Sund."

The rejection came as the Capitol Police department was beginning to change its assessment, recognizing that the massive Trump rally to protest the November 2020 election results planned for Jan. 6, 2021 had the potential for violence.

But by late December, Capitol Police internal emails and documents show, information began flowing in that some groups expected to attend were talking on social media or fringe websites about tactics like blocking tunnels leading to the Capitol.

On Sunday, Jan. 3, 2021, just hours after Gallagher rejected the Pentagon's initial offer, the Capitol Police issued a new and darker security assessment to its commanders and executives and to the two political appointees in Congress responsible for security, the House and Senate sergeants at arms, the timeline shows.

"Due to the tense political environment following the 2020 election, the threat of disruptive actions or violence cannot be ruled out," the new assessment declared. "Supporters of the current president see January 6, 2021 as the last opportunity to overturn the results of the presidential election. This sense of desperation and disappointment may lead to more of an incentive to become violent."

Within 24 hours, Sund had changed his mind and began seeking permission from the political powers surrounding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer to deploy the National Guard as a preventive measure on Monday, Jan. 4, 2021.

The Capitol Police official timeline provides the most succinct summary of a series of events around Sund's request, some of which have been disputed and at times misreported in the news media.

"COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the January 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed."

Walker, according to the police timeline, told Sund that if the chief could change minds and eventually get the approval from Capitol officials his team could deploy 125 troops quickly.

While Sund's requests were being delayed and denied, the Pentagon was forging ahead on Jan. 4, 2021 to get Trump to formally sign authorizations to deploy in advance of Jan. 6, 2021 as many as 20,000 National Guard troops if Congress asked, according to interviews Just the News has done with then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller and his chief of staff Kash Patel.

"We went to the Capitol Police and the Secret Service and law enforcement agencies and Mayor Bowser days before January 6, and asked them, 'Do you want thousands of National Guardsmen and women for January 6?'" Patel said in a detailed interview earlier this year. "They all said no. Why did we do that? The law requires them to request it before we can deploy them. And the DOD IG found we did not delay, we actually prepared in a preemptive fashion, which is what we do at DOD."

Patel told Just the News on Wednesday night that the police timeline validated the account he has given to Congress.

"The Capitol Police timeline shows what we have been saying for the last year — that DOD support via the National Guard was refused by the House and Senate sergeant at arms, who report to Pelosi," Patel said. "Now we have it in their own writing, days before Jan. 6. And despite the FBI warning of potential for serious disturbance, no perimeter was established, no agents put on the street, and no fence put up."

As word circulated around the nation's capital that Sund wanted National Guardsmen deployed, District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser wrote a preemptive letter to Miller and other Pentagon and Justice Department officials asking that troops not be deployed unless the Metropolitan Police Department approved, citing an incident in summer 2020, when troops were deployed at Lafayette Park near the White House during civil disobedience,

"An online thread discussed specific calls for violence to include stating 'Be ready to fight. Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in and blood from their BLM and Antifa slave soldiers being spilled,'" the FBI bulletin read, relaying the exact words intercepted by intelligence. "'Get violent ... stop calling this a march or rally or a protest. Go there ready for war. We get our President or we die.'"

Remarkably, the Capitol Police's own after-action report concluded, that FBI intelligence warning was not shared with Sund or incorporated into the operational plan sent to police commanders and officers preparing to man the frontlines.

File
USCP-Jan6AfterActionReportandRecommendations6-4-21.pdf
But with the Jan. 6 event mere hours away, Capitol Police — aware they had no National Guard backup — asked the Capitol Architect to make some last-minute changes and eliminate a bike rack that initially was going to be used as a perimeter barrier. The Architect obliged but viewed the police request as ill-advised, internal emails show.

"This seems absolutely illogical," Architect Brett Blanton wrote a colleague just 15 hours before the violence began. "It removes a zone of defense. If you find out a logical impetus for the change, let me know ASAP. I'll make calls to the board if necessary."

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL