Close Please enter your Username and Password


jiminycricket1 73M
5404 posts
2/20/2020 12:10 am
Amy Klobuchar lost tonight.


The idea of a presidential candidate who can defeat trump is not to attack him, but to counter attack.
Let me give you hat I would have considered a good counter attack for Amy Klobuchar. the first thing. is she Never really needed to defend herself from the attack by Buttigeig.. It may have been asurprise ...NO excuse.. It may have made her mad.. NO excuse She may have wanted to hit Buttigeig over the head with notebook. NO excuse.
And in the final straw, she let Warren defend her..Oh my! how bad could it get.
Anyway here's the response Amy should have made..to Buttigieg.

&Are you are going to stoop that low to try and use a 20 year old case when I was District attorney.. .A black teenage was arrested with two other black men.. for killing a 12 year old black girl.. well let me tell you a few thing.. That teenage was not INNOCENT..He at minimum was an accomplice.. he got tried for murder.....three reasons.. He didn't tell the truth, he didn't tell what he knew.. he didn't provide any verifiable information that he was not the shooter... if he wasn't, he damn well knew who was.. He did not cooperate. He took his chance in Trial,, and was convicted .. He had another opportunity to be tried and was convicted again.
That was 20 years ago.. let's look at today.. Another man lied, didn't tell what he knew and decided to go to trial and got convicted. Now tell me why he should get the sentence guideline and The black shouldn't ... OH I fought.. he is the friend of a corrupt President.
Now maybe the law needs to be black and white about these thing.... BUT JUSTICE NEEDS TO BE BLIND..
So don't tell it to me and the people here.. Tell it to that 12 old girl's mother and relatives. tell it to her schoolmates... tell it to her teachers

I didn't recall the name of Mexico president.. That must mean, i don't care about Mexicans..... Yes those dots can be connected???

(((Tell them you know everything and i know "squat-didley", and how you're just jealous??)))

Look at those people out there and tell Them ..How YOUR MESSAGE is going to SOLVE The prejudice against Latinos
Tell black people HOW YOUR MESSAGE is going to solve racism and criminal injustice
Tell women How YOUR MESSAGE is going to solve sexism.

Tell them you have the answers ..that I don't

Tell them you haven't sold your soul, your decency, honesty, and integrity by what you have tried to do here tonight..for political gain.. You stoop to the level that we are fighting against?

Then look at me... tell me you got something else on ME.. something worthy of this primary. Tell ME that's not all you got.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/20/2020 12:34 am

WARREN Won. Bloomberg couldn't counter.. For that matter none of them did. It was a bashing. Warren won just because she was the best basher.
Sander's non counter was the best.. because it didn't fail. it didn't do anything,

To Warren from Amy... One post it that can get done is worth more than a "blue moon" and five Pages of nonsense.


LeafReport 73M

2/20/2020 1:46 am

Yep that's what Amy should have done broadly. But there is no counter on not knowing, or remembering the Mexican leader's name. That's a question you simply have to have the answer for before you even get in a presidential race. Is it too much to ask to know every leader in the world? I don't know. But at a minimum you need to know every leader in the Western Hemisphere, every NATO nation and every leader who has troops deployed with our troops. You also better know who our enemies are, major non-NATO allies and have a canned response for the question that confirms you are working on foreign policy strategies with a commitment to engage with leaders pro-actively to expand trade, promote peace, action on climate change and spread freedom and American good will. If you can't prepare for all that you can't run for president.


LeafReport 73M

2/20/2020 3:34 am

What I'm saying is that Joe Biden will need Bloomberg's money, Elizabeth Warren's communication skills, her vision, and super delegate support. Without all of that Pelosi will have to impeach Trump again, and I don't rule that out.


LeafReport 73M

2/20/2020 3:58 am

Getting rid of Bernie Sanders is becoming a big problem.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/20/2020 9:45 am

    Quoting LeafReport:
    Yep that's what Amy should have done broadly. But there is no counter on not knowing, or remembering the Mexican leader's name. That's a question you simply have to have the answer for before you even get in a presidential race. Is it too much to ask to know every leader in the world? I don't know. But at a minimum you need to know every leader in the Western Hemisphere, every NATO nation and every leader who has troops deployed with our troops. You also better know who our enemies are, major non-NATO allies and have a canned response for the question that confirms you are working on foreign policy strategies with a commitment to engage with leaders pro-actively to expand trade, promote peace, action on climate change and spread freedom and American good will. If you can't prepare for all that you can't run for president.
well...I didn't know the Mexican President's name either..Using that answer to make meaning from it.. is beyond rational.. It searching for self-fullment.
So are you saying Amy Klobuchar is not smart enough to be President? WTF?

Amy Klobuchar didn't lose because of her dishonesty and answers..However.. buttigieg just may have.. she didn't lose because of what she HAD done. She lost because of what she didn't do.
She wasn't exposed as being stupid, or racist, or conservatives..WTF?
She wasn't expose as not have the ability to beat Trump..
She was exposed as to how she is going to stand up for herself, against an unfair attack.. Yes the attack was unfair..
The attack was purely for political gain, not to expose a truth.. Saying what you don't believe to get what you want..
Amy Klobuchar.. Was confronted with that same kind of maneuver, that every other candidate was expose to...She wasn't worse than any them..Her problem was she wasn't better. In Amy klobuchar position.. you can't make it being just as good.

Warren won.. not because she was better than the other candidates. She just proved she was better than most at bashing her opposition.. her problem is she's not better at bashing than TRUMP.

That whole debate just f*cked the Democrat party.. Bernie won the debate because everyone else lost.
We had an inspired democrat Party.. but on different "subjects".. it was a great start to beating Trump.. but That debate.. did not inspire anybody.. It Changed the "subject" of the inspiration and fractured the democrats. It said, much like you say, it's not good enough to just be inspired .. you got to inspired by the "Right' subject

So some, like you, can say Warren won, some can say that Bernie won..
You'd all be wrong..
Trump Won. Trump finally got the results he wanted.. he didn't have to lie, and cheat, and manuever to get what he wanted... the Democrat finally just gave it to him. He didn't have to DO anything. he got to have two rallies on the same night
.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/20/2020 10:02 am

You know Bloomberg got bashed for for his own self-fulfillment. He got exposed as what lengths he would go to do that. It was the right thing for Democrats to do..

But my gosh! Their hypocrisy of it... was truly amazing.

Each and everyone of them... Proved the length they would go.. for their own
self fulfillment.

The hypocrisy of what the problem is..when it''s someone else's problem.. but not yours.

that hypocrisy of Saving America from the problem. That you fight against and create at the same time.

This election is going to go bad... guaranteed..The day after tomorrow is only going to get worse....the hypocrisy of it, makes it so... and it seems it doesn't matter who we elect.
Leaf.... fool yourself all you want.. I have said YOU ARE THE PROBLEM. You don't get it.........Your just another self fullfilling hypocrite


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/20/2020 12:16 pm

    Quoting  :

So tell me LEAF.. what did YOU see that was negative about Amy Klobuchar.. that she convicted a 16 years black kid for murder 20 years ago.. Who wasn't totally innocent. that she couldn't recall the name of the President of Mexico.. that she wanted to declare English as the primary language of America. that she approved 36 of trumps 120 judges, when Bernie and Warren only approve 25 of them.
That she was wrong about this election being about honesty and decency, not policies.

Tell me you got more than that? Because what you think is for shit.

Amy Klobuchar lost last night.. Accept it and move on.,, but she didn't lose because of your stupid ass, self-fulfilling reasons.. she lost because she needed to prove she was better than she was. Not because of your asshole assumption she was proven worse. That she proved herself to be the worst of 24 candidates.

WTF.. do you think everybody is stupid?

You are the problem.. It didn't matter what Amy Klobuchar said or did.. the results for you would have been the same.. You're a closed minded, self righteous, SOB
.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/20/2020 12:38 pm

Leaf.. Don't pander me, anymore....I no longer believe you... You can't lead anymore.. You're not a leader....You can't convince me anymore.... You're a manipulator
Yes you are the problem... this election is about honesty and decency..of which you have very little.

Don't get me wrong.. It's not about ME.. You don't offend Me..
You offend MY COUNTRY.

Leaf.. I wanted to show you.. I'm not immune.. I know my faults.. like posting these response again..It wasn't right..I told you..... that all the should matter to me.. but you see..I am not immune to it.. I'm posting it again because. I want the whole world to know ......how f*cked up we are.. because of how f*cked up you are.

Now leaf let me explain how totally ignorant you are..You are going to take this personally.. It's not personal. You don't matter....We matter.
Leaf you do unto other.. what you expect they do unto YOU.
I don't.. Leaf you're not wrong.. No the problem is... You're just like everybody else, and think you are NOT.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/22/2020 11:31 am

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    Leaf.. Don't pander me, anymore....I no longer believe you... You can't lead anymore.. You're not a leader....You can't convince me anymore.... You're a manipulator
    Yes you are the problem... this election is about honesty and decency..of which you have very little.

    Don't get me wrong.. It's not about ME.. You don't offend Me..
    You offend MY COUNTRY.

    Leaf.. I wanted to show you.. I'm not immune.. I know my faults.. like posting these response again..It wasn't right..I told you..... that all the should matter to me.. but you see..I am not immune to it.. I'm posting it again because. I want the whole world to know ......how f*cked up we are.. because of how f*cked up you are.

    Now leaf let me explain how totally ignorant you are..You are going to take this personally.. It's not personal. You don't matter....We matter.
    Leaf you do unto other.. what you expect they do unto YOU.
    I don't.. Leaf you're not wrong.. No the problem is... You're just like everybody else, and think you are NOT.
You pompous, ineffectual little blowhard....."You don't offend me, you offend MY COUNTRY".......


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/22/2020 12:46 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    You pompous, ineffectual little blowhard....."You don't offend me, you offend MY COUNTRY".......
Now I know Canadian men usually have a moosehead hung on the wall, and some Canadian women.. hang his other personal things next to it.

Now what I said to leaf.. wasn't personal..It was about a State of mind.. To enlighten leaf to the commonality he has with others.. even some he opposes.

I know the difference when something is personal....Nothing leaf says to me is personal.. that being said...And to prove the difference.. what good for the goose is good for the gander ...

Where do you put your Moosehead?... let me ask YOU.. which end of the bottle do you put in first.?..... because no man is going to stick his nose in your 'business"
.
.
Can you tell how that emogee.. Changes the whole thing......Well that's another mistake you make.

And by the way.. to the horse you rode in on...Too.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/22/2020 12:49 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    You pompous, ineffectual little blowhard....."You don't offend me, you offend MY COUNTRY".......
"Ineffectual"....like you need to tell me?

Now I know Canadian men usually have a moosehead hung on the wall, and some Canadian women.. hang his other personal things next to it.

Now what I said to leaf.. wasn't personal..It was about a State of mind.. To enlighten leaf to the commonality he has with others.. even some he opposes.

I know the difference when something is personal....Nothing leaf says to me is personal.. that being said...And to prove the difference.. what good for the goose is good for the gander ...

Where do you put your Moosehead?... let me ask YOU.. which end of the bottle do you put in first.?..... because no man is going to stick his nose in your 'business"
.
.
.Can you tell how that emogee.. Changes the whole thing......Well that's another mistake you make.

And by the way.. to the horse you rode in on...Too.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/22/2020 4:22 pm

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    "Ineffectual"....like you need to tell me?

    Now I know Canadian men usually have a moosehead hung on the wall, and some Canadian women.. hang his other personal things next to it.

    Now what I said to leaf.. wasn't personal..It was about a State of mind.. To enlighten leaf to the commonality he has with others.. even some he opposes.

    I know the difference when something is personal....Nothing leaf says to me is personal.. that being said...And to prove the difference.. what good for the goose is good for the gander ...

    Where do you put your Moosehead?... let me ask YOU.. which end of the bottle do you put in first.?..... because no man is going to stick his nose in your 'business"
    .
    .
    .Can you tell how that emogee.. Changes the whole thing......Well that's another mistake you make.

    And by the way.. to the horse you rode in on...Too.
One would expect an original thinker such as yourself could come up with a better comeback than this list of cliches.....


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/22/2020 9:41 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    One would expect an original thinker such as yourself could come up with a better comeback than this list of cliches.....
Yes.. a comeback..
Like my ineffectual versus your effectual.. WTF?

Think where your post came from.. what you were thinking when you wrote it..

I'm Not "selling" my ideas.. I not shouting out to world my ideas to by pass by you..

You comment said nothing about me..but said a whole lot about you..
You stuck your nose in it, to tell the world.. how much YOU
THINK it stinks..
When i read your post.. it didn't make me mad.. Mine post to you was not a comeback.. it was a quiet subtle.. mirror.just a reflection of you, that I actually had a much harder time doing than you do
.... And the rest of the world could just think it's funny

The other day, I was talking to someone about woman.. who I thought was pretty.. Another woman said to me "she's not pretty..she's got fat thighs"
I replied back to her... that she was the ugly one..
She's not, and took offense...but the truth is.... she is.

Maybe you don't understand it either.. But in the same context...You are the "ugly" one.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/23/2020 9:25 am

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    Yes.. a comeback..
    Like my ineffectual versus your effectual.. WTF?

    Think where your post came from.. what you were thinking when you wrote it..

    I'm Not "selling" my ideas.. I not shouting out to world my ideas to by pass by you..

    You comment said nothing about me..but said a whole lot about you..
    You stuck your nose in it, to tell the world.. how much YOU
    THINK it stinks..
    When i read your post.. it didn't make me mad.. Mine post to you was not a comeback.. it was a quiet subtle.. mirror.just a reflection of you, that I actually had a much harder time doing than you do
    .... And the rest of the world could just think it's funny

    The other day, I was talking to someone about woman.. who I thought was pretty.. Another woman said to me "she's not pretty..she's got fat thighs"
    I replied back to her... that she was the ugly one..
    She's not, and took offense...but the truth is.... she is.

    Maybe you don't understand it either.. But in the same context...You are the "ugly" one.
Objectifying women makes you the ugly one.......When I pointed out that all the characters in in the Abrahamic religions, including God , have a penis and asked what that indicates about religion, you flipped out and told me what I think......That's how you always respond to me....you tell me what I think....over and over....you tell me what I think and then tell me I don't have any original thoughts.........They are YOUR thoughts about what you think I meant.....and they are wrong........


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/23/2020 2:31 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    Objectifying women makes you the ugly one.......When I pointed out that all the characters in in the Abrahamic religions, including God , have a penis and asked what that indicates about religion, you flipped out and told me what I think......That's how you always respond to me....you tell me what I think....over and over....you tell me what I think and then tell me I don't have any original thoughts.........They are YOUR thoughts about what you think I meant.....and they are wrong........
What don't you understand?
How can you understand what i wrote, and say it.. how can you so simply make that choice
We get into an argument about objectifying and subjectifying.. I said you don't understand where i'm coming.. Yet you continue on. to prove me right.

The idea that you think i objectify women.. Is your failure to understand subjectivity
I should apologize, for your misunderstanding.. because i say it.. and allow you think it.. I allow you to be offended. I am sorry I am not politically correct.. I'm sorry that I unintentionally hurt people's feeling.

Now you can believe that, or i 'm lying about that. You can believe iI don't mean it. you'd be wrong again. I understand and I mean it..I'm not pandering to you.. or seeking your forgiveness.. give it or not. That again is your choice not mine. but don't tell me I don't understand, because I'm not you.. because that voids any possible understanding.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/23/2020 5:11 pm

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    What don't you understand?
    How can you understand what i wrote, and say it.. how can you so simply make that choice
    We get into an argument about objectifying and subjectifying.. I said you don't understand where i'm coming.. Yet you continue on. to prove me right.

    The idea that you think i objectify women.. Is your failure to understand subjectivity
    I should apologize, for your misunderstanding.. because i say it.. and allow you think it.. I allow you to be offended. I am sorry I am not politically correct.. I'm sorry that I unintentionally hurt people's feeling.

    Now you can believe that, or i 'm lying about that. You can believe iI don't mean it. you'd be wrong again. I understand and I mean it..I'm not pandering to you.. or seeking your forgiveness.. give it or not. That again is your choice not mine. but don't tell me I don't understand, because I'm not you.. because that voids any possible understanding.

A very basic fundamental of language is that in order to communicate, people need to agree on a definition of terms.......This obsession you have with Subjective/Objective causes a lot of misunderstandings. You assume, for some unfathomable reason, that only you can think subjectively.....You label my thoughts "Objective" and rail at me for not understanding that your thoughts are subjective.......Why?

What is this strange need you have to label other people's thoughts either/or.....Then you claim that I am incapable of original thought......What is that?.......What is this idea you have of "Original Thought"?

I have been a creative thinker all my life....I have exercised this and consciously developed it...Creativity has been my passion and my life's work.

And what part does "original thought" play in creativity? The MRI people say that creative thinking arouses both the part of the brain that is activated during free-thought....like in daydreaming......and the practical part of the brain is also activated.... the part that deals with organization and function........The unification of Objective and Subjective aspects......

It seems to me that the terms "objective" and "subjective" are extremely limited......


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/23/2020 6:02 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    A very basic fundamental of language is that in order to communicate, people need to agree on a definition of terms.......This obsession you have with Subjective/Objective causes a lot of misunderstandings. You assume, for some unfathomable reason, that only you can think subjectively.....You label my thoughts "Objective" and rail at me for not understanding that your thoughts are subjective.......Why?

    What is this strange need you have to label other people's thoughts either/or.....Then you claim that I am incapable of original thought......What is that?.......What is this idea you have of "Original Thought"?

    I have been a creative thinker all my life....I have exercised this and consciously developed it...Creativity has been my passion and my life's work.

    And what part does "original thought" play in creativity? The MRI people say that creative thinking arouses both the part of the brain that is activated during free-thought....like in daydreaming......and the practical part of the brain is also activated.... the part that deals with organization and function........The unification of Objective and Subjective aspects......

    It seems to me that the terms "objective" and "subjective" are extremely limited......
Well subjectivity includes objectivity.. but objectivity only limits subjectivity.

I don't know where your idea of original thought came from.. I can tell what i think of it... as it relates to you. although i don't think I ever really said it. The way you hear it..

Original thought can not be about agreement and disagreement.. When you Use an agreement about me.. you are denying your own thoughts..
For example your thought about me, and ET's thought about me are totally different.
Yet you both tend to agree with each other.. It's not agreement, it's justification and confirmation.. It's only real because you want to make it real. you refuse to get into a discussion about how each you differ in your opinions.... So you use hers and and uses yours. It denies your own originality.

Now you may believe you and ET see it the same.. you don't... ET has and emotional dislike of me.. Yours is more a "prejudicial" rational.. ET avoids me because i piss her off.. When she responds, it because she just can't take me anymore.. she lashes out with her responses every time....
You tolerate me.. although most the time.. You want to hit me over the head, Yet you still want to bring me down


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/23/2020 6:12 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    A very basic fundamental of language is that in order to communicate, people need to agree on a definition of terms.......This obsession you have with Subjective/Objective causes a lot of misunderstandings. You assume, for some unfathomable reason, that only you can think subjectively.....You label my thoughts "Objective" and rail at me for not understanding that your thoughts are subjective.......Why?

    What is this strange need you have to label other people's thoughts either/or.....Then you claim that I am incapable of original thought......What is that?.......What is this idea you have of "Original Thought"?

    I have been a creative thinker all my life....I have exercised this and consciously developed it...Creativity has been my passion and my life's work.

    And what part does "original thought" play in creativity? The MRI people say that creative thinking arouses both the part of the brain that is activated during free-thought....like in daydreaming......and the practical part of the brain is also activated.... the part that deals with organization and function........The unification of Objective and Subjective aspects......

    It seems to me that the terms "objective" and "subjective" are extremely limited......
Well subjectivity includes objectivity.. but objectivity only limits subjectivity.

I don't know where your idea of original thought came from.. I can tell what i think of it... as it relates to you. although i don't think I ever really said it. The way you hear it..

Original thought can not be about agreement and disagreement.. When you Use an agreement about me.. you are denying your own thoughts..
For example your thought about me, and ET's thought about me are totally different.
Yet you both tend to agree with each other.. It's not agreement, it's justification and confirmation.. It's only real because you want to make it real. you refuse to get into a discussion about how each you differ in your opinions.... So you use hers and she uses yours. It denies your own originality.

Now you may believe you and ET see it the same.. you don't... ET has and emotional dislike of me.. Yours is more a "prejudicial" rational.. ET avoids me because i piss her off.. When she responds, it because she just can't take me anymore.. she lashes out with her responses every time....
You tolerate me.. although most the time.. You want to hit me over the head, Yet you still want to bring me down.. so you NEVER can agree, at least mostly agree.
You think I'm arrogant, pompous, and act like I know it all.. Well clear that up i don't KNOW shit , I just can recognize it when I see it
.I don't expect anyone to agree... I want people to re-evaluate so they can agree with themselves
For example your God thing I totally understand and I agree, but i ain't going let you off the hook that easy. I know how you go about using it.. is for shit.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/23/2020 7:50 pm

See, there you go again telling me what I think....case in point.....you inform both ET and I what we feel and think about both each other and you.....LOL...

My only desire in respect to you, is to have a conversation. You make that very difficult with your constant assumptions......Do you really think that Human Psychology is so simple that all our thoughts can be classified as either Subjective or Objective?.......Really?.....And do you really think that there is any value or truth in categorizing the thoughts of people who you have never met, who you know only through a very few exchanges on a public forum?......

And do you really think that your statement " subjectivity includes objectivity.. but objectivity only limits subjectivity" makes any sense at all to anyone but yourself?......But then again, I should probably just accept the reality that you are on a public forum only to talk to yourself.....in fact, I seem to recall that you have stated that several times and your habit of posting many comments in a row without input from anyone else........

Which bring me to the crux......If you are unwilling to define your terminology and you are uninterested in conversation, why the hell are you posting on a public forum?


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/24/2020 1:58 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    See, there you go again telling me what I think....case in point.....you inform both ET and I what we feel and think about both each other and you.....LOL...

    My only desire in respect to you, is to have a conversation. You make that very difficult with your constant assumptions......Do you really think that Human Psychology is so simple that all our thoughts can be classified as either Subjective or Objective?.......Really?.....And do you really think that there is any value or truth in categorizing the thoughts of people who you have never met, who you know only through a very few exchanges on a public forum?......

    And do you really think that your statement " subjectivity includes objectivity.. but objectivity only limits subjectivity" makes any sense at all to anyone but yourself?......But then again, I should probably just accept the reality that you are on a public forum only to talk to yourself.....in fact, I seem to recall that you have stated that several times and your habit of posting many comments in a row without input from anyone else........

    Which bring me to the crux......If you are unwilling to define your terminology and you are uninterested in conversation, why the hell are you posting on a public forum?
Let me define it...objectivity is a tree and subjectivity is a forest. You can have a tree but no forest.. but you can't have a forest without a tree.. I am not telling you what you think.. I am telling you what i think.. if that's... not right don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about ... Tell me what you think..
the idea you have that misinterprets me.. doesn't go both ways.. You ask me questions and I give you answer.. why I believe you misinterpreted .. I ask you questions and you give me shit. like I'm pulling my interpretation out of my ass.

My ideas of subjectivity and objectivity is only my explanation of why you misinterpret. It's say nothing about the right or wrong of your interpretation.

You won't read this response how I intend it... you are stubborn and prejudicial.
I understand YOU but you refuse to understand me.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
2/24/2020 2:44 pm

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    Let me define it...objectivity is a tree and subjectivity is a forest. You can have a tree but no forest.. but you can't have a forest without a tree.. I am not telling you what you think.. I am telling you what i think.. if that's... not right don't tell me I don't know what I'm talking about ... Tell me what you think..
    the idea you have that misinterprets me.. doesn't go both ways.. You ask me questions and I give you answer.. why I believe you misinterpreted .. I ask you questions and you give me shit. like I'm pulling my interpretation out of my ass.

    My ideas of subjectivity and objectivity is only my explanation of why you misinterpret. It's say nothing about the right or wrong of your interpretation.

    You won't read this response how I intend it... you are stubborn and prejudicial.
    I understand YOU but you refuse to understand me.
You use terminology that is your personal and apparently private version rather than accepted definitions......and are either unable or unwilling to use common language.......then you claim that you understand me........

OK.....I get it now, no point in having a discussion with someone with such a stubborn and advanced case of Dunning-Kruger....


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
2/25/2020 6:49 am

Well... yes it's my problem.. I don't accept the "accepted version" of anything..