| Blogs > jiminycricket1 > My Blog |
|
The Supreme Court In 20 I wrote numerous blogs about the Supreme Court.. How pissed off i was about it. How the attitudes about the Supreme court were going destroy this country. During the Depression FDR.. Tried set a Supreme Court. that would favor his NEW DEAL. the idea of FDR about that.. was not PROMOTE the "New Deal" , but simply not have it struck down by the courts. Supreme Court Majority Balance Based Upon Party Appointments Over Time Here is a chart simplified highlight how many seats were filled through appointments by each party every year since 1873. The brighter area in the middle between the thin lines represents the majority party. Republican appointments have been in control of the Supreme Court with five or more seats most years since 1873. Republican appointees controlled the Court solidly from 1873 through 1938 then again from 1971 through 20. Democratic appointees controlled the Court most years from 1939 through 1970. Roe v Wade was enacted during a Republican majority Supreme Court. From 1938 1970 the Democrat dominance was entirely based FDR's appointments Throughout the years Republican have held the presidency 53 % of the time... However. Republican presidents have appointed 72% of the Justices. The Court has consistently held a Republican bias. However Court decisions did not reflect that. The Court, no matter the political leaning of it's justice, remained apolitcal. |
|||
|
Throughout the years.. As a group. the only people who understood the meaning of the Supreme court, it's duty, and it Constitutional obligations.. were the Supreme Court Justices themselves. They were essential to the Constitution. they were the only group of officials who are totally removed from "WE the People".. what the majority wanted didn't matter to them. In our founding father's government .. the issue of Roe V Wade.. is not about abortion..It's NOT about it being a fair or unfair law..It's NOT about murdering babies or protecting women's rights. it's only about if the Law is Constitutional. Those thing aren't consider by the Court.. they are considered by the writing of the law and the duty of We the people, of the duty of the Legislatures Don't expect the court to write the law.. That's not their duty. You want to correct Roe V Wade then re-write the fricken law. Get it passed. You want to end Obamacare. rewrite the fricken law and get it passed. Overturning the law. is overturning, a more unbiased Supreme Court's decision that the law is Constitutional. It is apparent that the Roe V Wade decision was originally based on founding fathers principal, duties and obligation of the Supreme Court. It was not biased because the majority control of the Supreme court.. was Republican. Granted, I do not see that being Republican has anything to do with it. but that's not what other people see. The Destruction of the court is not about being a Republican.. it's about nominating a "certain type" of Republican. Republicans have had control.. they still have control.. But obviously, Republican control is not good enough. One can't depend on the outcome of just being Republican.. So, it not about control... it's about dominance and the TYPE of Control.. That is all you need to know.. to know it's UN-Constitutional. What brought this up to me is not the actions of Trump.. but the actions of Democrat Progressives.. whose sole idea is that THEY must control the COURT. to get their issues passed. Which apparently means if one side doesn't kill you ...the other side will. I say f*ck them all... and the fake Constitutions they rode in on.
| ||
9/24/2020 12:52 pm |
In the past I haven't really feared the court that much. I started to get concerned however with the Bork nomination, then the Thomas debacle concerned me, then the ridiculous nomination of Harriet Myers. McConnell's filibuster abuses furthered the mess and then came Kavanaugh who didn't have the decency to withdraw. The claims against him were credible I thought. Some mistakes just have life long consequences. What concerned me more was the Hastert rule in the House when the GOP was in control and the refusal to hold votes on important legislation. If the congress did their job the impact of the courts wouldn't concern anybody.
| ||
|
yes .. it is true. You're a typical Trump supporter.. too stupid to realize what you say.. You own your kids and can abuse them if you want. You have the right to force people to pray in public places. the idea I have which people think are far fetched.. aint so far fetch..You are just the same as those you oppose. those you accuse.. you accuse yourself A Muslim religion that call sit itself Christian.. And wants Islamic State rights. Yes you are correct.. it been going on for centuries. you wants those right back. Go to an Islamic State.. Those rights are protected there.
| ||
|
yes .. it is true. You're a typical Trump supporter.. too stupid to realize what you say.. You own your kids and can abuse them if you want. You have the right to force people to pray in public places. the idea I have which people think are far fetched.. aint so far fetch..You are just the same as those you oppose. those you accuse.. you accuse yourself A Muslim religion that call sit itself Christian.. And wants Islamic State rights. Yes you are correct.. it been going on for centuries. you wants those right back. Go to an Islamic State.. Those rights are protected there.   ....
|
×
×