Close Please enter your Username and Password


posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
5/31/2019 8:52 pm


It's mind-boggling to the rest of the world to watch this go down.....to watch the 30%ers keep repeating that Trump has been exonerated by the Mueller Report........It's like watching a movie all the way through and realize that there's a group of people who are in a theatre where the movie just keeps repeating the middle section and never reaches the conclusion.........they aren't forced to remain in the faulty theater, they choose to stay and stay because gollnabbit, they paid admission and they're not quitters..


butterfly21 74F
205 posts
6/1/2019 8:23 am

The special counsels job was to investigate, He did it, not his job to impeach, nor his job to prosecute the President. A sitting President can not be charged with a crime nor held accountable by a special prosecutor. How can the department of Justice charge and investigate their boss? That is one reason it is Congresses JOB and not the Special Prosecutors or the Department of Justices job to prosecute the President. The President is held accountable by Congress!

If the President is re-elected the statue of limitations on his crime will have ran out, and he will not be held accountable..


TxJW19 81M

6/1/2019 12:44 pm

Mueller Was charged with investigating-----Then he makes his referral----The AG tried to change the message----Anyone who can understand written words can see that. He did only a false narrative to protect trump.

It is the duty of congress to determine what happens after the SPECIAL investigation.

AND since the report said trump was not vindicated----THAT indicates Congress is to take it from there.

And the way to proceed with ability to Receive all information---is through the process of impeachment which enforces subpoenas.

That needs to happen ASAP.

Trump I his attorneys & Barr know it is coming so they keep trying to convince the gullible that the report means something other than what it clearly stated.

Many can read the report but then someone else must tell them what it means.
It is called lack of reading comprehension.LOL

MAJOR PROBLEM
Party On!


dusty117 73M

6/1/2019 1:51 pm

Skariff, once I accepted the basic premise it all became easier to understand.

Racism and bigotry override everything. White Republican Media has finally wormed it's way into a presidency. Trump's goal to rip off the US Treasury needed way more than the 'super wealthy' vote so he reached out to racists, bigots and uneducated. The premise … white trash is alive and well in the USA.

In this particular case I'm pretty sure that much of the 30% are capable of understanding that the rules are different for a sitting president and that of a common criminal. They might not be getting the NEWS .. LOL

Keep on rocken in the free world!


LeafReport 73M

6/1/2019 4:20 pm

    Quoting  :

By the way...the Navy acknowledged the correspondence asking they hide the McCain during Trump's visit to Japan. Is there anything you don't lie about? What a disgrace.


TxJW19 81M

6/1/2019 7:22 pm

Block are you actually that dense or just playing games?


hobsonschoice 75F
3600 posts
6/1/2019 8:25 pm

    Quoting  :

More than 450 former federal prosecutors signed onto a letter Monday claiming that if Donald Trump was not a sitting president, he would have been found guilty of obstruction of justice from evidence laid out in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe.
"Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice," according to the letter.
Attorney General William Barr did not push for obstruction charges against Trump after Mueller submitted his report on the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, where he also laid out evidence of obstruction by the president.
Barr has stood by his characterization and decision not to pursue obstruction charges during a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

House Democrats have also called on Barr to testify before the House Judiciary Committee, in addition to providing Congress with an unredacted version of Mueller's 448-page report. However, Barr has not testified nor submitted the unredacted report, prompting the House committee to begin contempt proceedings against the attorney general as early as Wednesday for his failure to provide the unredacted report.
In the letter, the former federal prosecutors said that the Mueller report "describes multiple efforts by the president to curtail the scope of the Special Counsel’s investigation," and pointed to when Trump pressured then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to reverse his decision to recuse himself from overseeing Mueller's investigation. The letter also pointed out that the president directed his then-chief of staff Reince Priebus to fire Sessions, which Priebus refused.
"In our system, every accused person is presumed innocent and it is always the government’s burden to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt," the former prosecutors wrote. "But, to look at these facts and say that a prosecutor could not probably sustain a conviction for obstruction of justice — the standard set out in Principles of Federal Prosecution — runs counter to logic and our experience."

Several prominent attorneys signed onto the letter, including Elkan Abramowitz, who is representing American Media Inc. CEO David Pecker. Pecker has in the past supported Trump and AMI has been implicated in a scheme to buy controversial stories involving Trump with the intent of making sure they were not published.

In addition, former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, who announced he running for president as a Republican in a primary challenge to Trump, also signed onto the letter. Weld was formerly the assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division at the Justice Department.
"We believe strongly that, but for the OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) memo, the overwhelming weight of professional judgment would come down in favor of prosecution for the conduct outlined in the Mueller Report," the letter concludes.


USA today


TxJW20 81M

6/2/2019 7:04 am

Block the Problem IS----when you read something---you often fail to grasp the meaning.
That is why your own statements do not always coincide with your cut & pastes.
Confusing. Isn't it? LOL
Party On!


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
6/2/2019 3:41 pm

Until US politicians, on both sides of the aisle wean themselves off corporate money, very little will change. Trump is a corporate puppet and so are GOP leadership. The tax bill and deregulation are nothing but gifts to their corporate masters.......


TxJW20 81M

6/3/2019 7:48 am

The Party Of The People must win or we are SOL.
Party On!