| Blogs > Nileyears > My Blog |
|
What Could Go Wrong? This post is only viewable by YoungAtHeart members. Join YoungAtHeart now! |
||||
|
| |||
|
American.....is failing, it had a good run. It is not just us though, the world is failing. I can't even believe we keep anything Nuclear active, especially with all the Nutters we seem to put in charge globally.
| |||
|
YES WHAT COULD GO WRONG? WE ARE SEEING WHAT COULD GO WRONG RIGHT NOW IN AMERICA. THEY HATED TRUMP.REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES STOLE THE ELECTION TO PUT IN PLACE A SENILE PEDO THAT HAS F**KEDUP SO BAD WE HAVE NO MONEY, CANT AFFORD ANYTHING AND W HAVE NO OIL NOV 2024 WILL BE THE RECKONING THE SHEEP WILL FOLLOW NANCY OVE THE CLIFF THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL
| |||
|
Come what may, we might just have to ride out the storm on a wing, a prayer and a firm hold on our hats (or toupees).
| |||
10/18/2022 6:03 pm |
The guy is a genius. Sell stored oil for less than it was purchased for. We can always buy it back ( AFTER THE ELECTION )at an even higher price than what we paid in the beginning. LMAOFF !
| |||
10/18/2022 6:20 pm |
Then there is our Texas governor campaigning ----- claiming he is working to lower property tax ----- While he and his guys in Austin have a mandate out for counties to raise property values. My man cave property value was appraised over 30% higher LAST YEAR. This year with the Austin mandate it was appraised 107% higher than last year. Those repubs are taking care of us?????? I know a backdoor lie when I hear it. Beto could not do worse where I am concerned.
| |||
10/18/2022 6:35 pm |
I am not familiar with communist Marxist sheep but I know what affects me. LOL But the chocolate milk from black angus cows is special like the choice cuts of beef. LMAOFF Then those damn marxist communist chickens in China and elsewhere may be laying cheapo eggs and they charge too much for them. There is a lot going wrong in todays world. Enjoy And Party On!
| |||
|
They NUTTERS are in charge of the Whitehouse.
| |||
|
WSJ Opinion: Prop. 29 Puts Union Coercion on the California Ballot The SEIU-UHW forces dialysis clinics to spend big fighting a measure that would hurt patients. 10/17/2022 It is difficult to see how a proposal which mandates that dialysis clinics have " at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant on-site during all the hours patients receive treatments at that clinic. This individual must have at least six months of experience providing care to kidney patients" could 'hurt patients'. Gee, what could go wrong there? Nothing much that I can see. The union isnot 'forcing' clinics to spend lots of money opposing the measure; they are choosing to do so to maintain their profits. REUTERS: U.S. could sell oil from emergency reserve this week 10/18/2022 Saudi's aren't going to do Biden's biding, Biden won't let us produce enough oil to keep us on our feet much less keep our reserves at max. "Oct 18 (Reuters) - Oil prices settled lower on Tuesday on fears of higher U.S. supply combined with an economic slowdown and lower Chinese fuel demand. Brent crude futures settled down $1.59, or 1.7%, to $90.03 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WT  crude settled down $2.64, or 3.1%, to $82.82 per barrel." NOTICE HIGHER US PRODUCTION IS DRIVING PRICES LOWER. Looks like you got your comment arse about face Nile. Hhhhhhmmmm, what could go wrong with that? Looks like nothing is going wrong with that and US oil production is being ramped up. JFYI -- Average monthly US crude oil production in 2019 was 12.3 million barrels equivalent. That sank to 11.6 in 2020 , then 11.25 in 2021 (both due to economic slowdown during the pandemic) and is rising this year - averaging 11.6 million barrels per month up to end of August and still rising. Once again the facts belie what you posted. Saved the best for last! Newsweek: Would Nuclear War "Solve" Climate Change? 10/10/2022 This is the headline on a fact check which was instituted on a claim on a Twitter account, not a bloody proposal to launch a nuclear war for the fun of it. The Fact check conclusion was "False. While it is true that even a small nuclear war could have a global cooling effect, it is not correct to say that this would solve the climate crisis. This is partly because the cooling effects would be temporary, and partly because a nuclear winter would be a climate crisis in and of itself, causing global food shortages and potentially billions of deaths." Newsweek was not advocating a nuclear war - and neither was anyone else. Is this a case of reading the headline and not the article so getting only a small and heavily unrepresentative version of the whole thing? YOU BET IT IS.
| |||
|
They want to unionize these clinics and according to those who work there, they don't want to be unionized. What could go wrong? The union calls for a strike and the clinics would be shut down. What happens then when a dialysis patient needs treatments 5 days a week? They die! My son in law had treatments 5 days a week, I know what he went through. Ramping up oil production? No, better research that one a bit more. The US uses more than being produced. Maybe you better look beyond what your fact checkers are telling you. BTW, prices are going up again, or didn't you notice? If we were producing more, we would see prices going down and the oil reserve filling back up. Neither is happening. Where does it say that I said Newsweek advocates nuclear war? I didn't say that, you did!
| |||
|
They want to unionize these clinics and according to those who work there, they don't want to be unionized. What could go wrong? The union calls for a strike and the clinics would be shut down. What happens then when a dialysis patient needs treatments 5 days a week? They die! My son in law had treatments 5 days a week, I know what he went through. Ramping up oil production? No, better research that one a bit more. The US uses more than being produced. Maybe you better look beyond what your fact checkers are telling you. BTW, prices are going up again, or didn't you notice? If we were producing more, we would see prices going down and the oil reserve filling back up. Neither is happening. Where does it say that I said Newsweek advocates nuclear war? I didn't say that, you did! YOU DARE TO QUESTION THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN. , WIZ OF OZZ, DR FAUCI, BIDEN, TRUDEAU ETC. JUST A FINE SCHOLARLY GENT THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL
| |||
|
They want to unionize these clinics and according to those who work there, they don't want to be unionized. What could go wrong? The union calls for a strike and the clinics would be shut down. What happens then when a dialysis patient needs treatments 5 days a week? They die! My son in law had treatments 5 days a week, I know what he went through. Ramping up oil production? No, better research that one a bit more. The US uses more than being produced. Maybe you better look beyond what your fact checkers are telling you. BTW, prices are going up again, or didn't you notice? If we were producing more, we would see prices going down and the oil reserve filling back up. Neither is happening. Where does it say that I said Newsweek advocates nuclear war? I didn't say that, you did! From Ballotopedia "California Proposition 29, the Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative, is on the ballot in California as an initiated state statute on November 8, 2022. A "yes" vote supports this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. A "no" vote opposes this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. " You are the one who needs to do your research From the EIA site "The United States was a total petroleum net exporter in 2020 and 2021 In 2021, the United States exported about 8.63 million barrels per day (b/d) and imported about 8.47 million b/d of petroleum, making the United States an annual total petroleum net exporter for the second year in a row for the first time since at least 1949. Total petroleum net exports were about 0.16 million b/d in 2021, and total petroleum net exports in 2020 were 0.63 million b/d." From the NYTimes 23rd Sept The price of gasoline continues to fall steadily, easing pressure on American consumers as the cost of filling a tank continued to tumble from record levels reached earlier in the summer. Gas prices fell 10.6 percent in August, which helped moderate still-sky-high inflation, Tuesday’s Consumer Price Index report showed. The energy index, which tracks gasoline and electricity among other energy sources, dropped 5 percent last month, as electricity and natural gas prices rose. After peaking at $5.02 in June, gasoline prices have dropped for 91 straight days, and the national average stood at just over $3.70 a gallon on Tuesday, data from AAA show. Crude oil prices are going down again as supply continues to keep up with demand. I repost what I posted above "Oct 18 (Reuters) - Oil prices settled lower on Tuesday on fears of higher U.S. supply combined with an economic slowdown and lower Chinese fuel demand. Brent crude futures settled down $1.59, or 1.7%, to $90.03 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate ( WTI ) crude settled down $2.64, or 3.1%, to $82.82 per barrel." NOTICE HIGHER US PRODUCTION IS DRIVING PRICES LOWER. You want to argue with the EIA and the price of oil? Their figures make your assertations look a little foolish don't you think? You can have your own opinions but you are not allowed to post your own facts.
| |||
|
So your answer to havingyour nose rubbed in the FACTS is to post an ad hominem and then a load of OPINIONS. You simply do not have a clue do you? Typical RWNJ response. THE FACTS prove that what you posted was nonsense so you deny the facts and go back to sticking your fingers in your ears and singing 'La La La ' at the top of your voice. You have been proven wrong - no amount o bluster and name calling will alter that.
| |||
|
Now you really are getting desperate. All you have left are insults and nonsense. How can the price at the pump (end user price) influence the price of a barrel of oil (producer price) in the way you aver? That is economically illiterate. Simple economics dictates that prices to producers are governed by the balance between supply and demand. If demand goes down while supply goes up then prices fall - that is axiomatic. Logically if end user prices rise and that results in a fall in demand because users rein in their sending then prices paid to producers will fall, the very opposite of what you posted. I should not have to school someone so 'wise' in the simplest of economic realities but here we are. Seems your idea of someone being a 'old pompous jerk ' (ad hominem means you have lost your argument) is that they know more than you. It seems I do not have to do much to demonstrate that I am smarter than you; your descent into invective and your inability to refute the facts ad even less to interpret them prove that beyond any doubt. BTW -Google is a search engine which merely aids the user in finding information from the 'library' whch is the internet. Using Google to search out information from reliable sources (eg The Energy Information Administration EIA ) is what research has always been about. Finding reliable, factual evidence from those sources and cross checking the facts (fact checking) is what real researchers do. You should try it sometime then you would not make yourself look so foolish on an open forum. Eschewing the facts in favour of your anecdotal experience and taking your information from sources which support your confirmation bias is the antithesis of research; but it is, sadly, where we are with so many in the US. If that sounds pompous to you then diddums. I am sorry to have hurt your feelings, or maybe I am not sorry
| |||
|
Do you always post non-sequiturs? 1. You seem to be the one with hurt feelings as you are the one who has now come back twice to insult posts without refuting anything. 2. You are the only one playing the victim. If you feel belittled then that is your problem but it does not entitle you to victim status. After all you are the only one who is name calling. Do you actally think through what you post or are your feelings too badly hurt for rationality to break through?
| |||
|
Do you always post non-sequiturs? 1. You seem to be the one with hurt feelings as you are the one who has now come back twice to insult posts without refuting anything. 2. You are the only one playing the victim. If you feel belittled then that is your problem but it does not entitle you to victim status. After all you are the only one who is name calling. Do you actally think through what you post or are your feelings too badly hurt for rationality to break through? My comments must really be eating away at you, you keep coming back for more insults, or you don't have much of a life... maybe both. Thanks for the laugh!
| |||
10/22/2022 6:32 pm |
Today 10/22/2022 I paid $2.98 retail for gas in Waco, Texas
| |||
|
I see you still have to get in another childish insult. Not very grown up. Seems you are not happy about being taken to the cleaners in an argument so you have to descend to kindergaten level yet again. Never mind; you will get over it and I will simply go away and have a good chuckle at your discomfiture. You ceased to be amusing when you got down to grade three level.
| |||
|
Still trying to insult and failing miserably. Now which behaviour reminds one of a spoilt child I wonder? The petulance gives it away. lol Why is it that being corrected stirs up such childish behaviour?
| |||
|
Still trying to insult and failing miserably. Now which behaviour reminds one of a spoilt child I wonder? The petulance gives it away. lol Why is it that being corrected stirs up such childish behaviour? WIDOW TOLD ME ALL ABOUT YOU AND SHE WAS RIGHT WHAT ID IS NEXT HAHAHAHAHA THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL
|
×
×