Blogs > > My Blog |
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
5/23/2019 4:37 pm |
Block type something you want to hear & sign my name to it.
| ||
|
The media is very good at picking up "catch phrases" and repeating them over and over like a parrot, so that people listening will also believe it and begin to think like them. Be a prism, spreading God's light and love, not a mirror reflecting the world's hatred.
| ||
|
Block type something you want to hear & sign my name to it.
| ||
5/23/2019 8:14 pm |
shoepolish
| ||
|
cockroach
| ||
|
Plagiarism is the antithesis of intelligence.
| ||
|
You just don't get it.......I don't think killing the unborn is laughable or hilarious, I think the article itself is......not the subject matter.....the article and the fact that you used the obviously phony thing as a representation of an actuality.........That's what happens when you don't practice discretion......and have no sense of style or irony.......
| ||
5/24/2019 4:50 pm |
Block let me help you out. Here are some clues as to "what cover-up". Donald Trump is employed by the federal government. The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the authority to investigate him. The House has authorization as per the Constitution to subpoena Trump's business dealings, his associates, family etc. What part of the Constitution do you object to?
| ||
5/24/2019 5:26 pm |
Tampering with witnesses is illegal in normal court proceedings & is definitely obstruction of justice. In our government forbidding witnesses to testify before Congress is OK. Weird. But also inexcusable to anyone with normal mental faculty.
| ||
5/24/2019 8:54 pm |
Block, you're loosing it man. Mrs. Clinton isn't the one getting impeached. And make no mistake about it, impeachment is here. The House is smart to wait until Republicans are onboard.
| ||
|
You state that you are under the impression that I think "killing babies" is funny. That's what you have assumed from my commentary to a story you copied. You have no more knowledge of what the author's intent was than I do.......All you did was click a couple of keys......you had absolutely no input into the creation of the story. Now I read the story and respond to it and you object to my response.....in fact, you make wrong assumptions about my response, based on nothing but an "emoticon".........and insult me. Then I explain that your assumption about MY response is wrong and you expect me to prove to you that you were right about your assumptions.............................Have you no idea of how ridiculous that is? You didn't write the story......you don't know the person who wrote it, you have no more information than I do........We disagree about the author's intention......That's it Bigblock........We disagree on the author's intention..... And by the way......I hate to break it to you, but teeth don't get sunburned......
|
×
×