Blogs > > My Blog |
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
|
The left has never been very good at moral equivalencies. Let me help you: PERHAPS some people have chosen Country over Religion. You self-righteous, ignorant grubers have chosen freebies over Country.
| ||
|
The left has never been very good at moral equivalencies. Let me help you: PERHAPS some people have chosen Country over Religion. You self-righteous, ignorant grubers have chosen freebies over Country. The user of the term imagines a kind of independent position above or beyond the two contenders. The moral equivalence theory allows someone using the term to appear both objective and detached at the same time. The general form of the context for the use of the trope is The actions of A are morally equivalent to the actions of B, therefore A is just as good or bad as B, regardless of what the actual actions are. Doing X is morally equivalent to doing Y, therefore someone doing X is just as good or bad someone doing Y, regardless of what X and Y actually are. The concept of moral equivalence is not a term of philosophy; rather, it is only a logical fallacy used in arguments
| ||
|
Thanks for the long-winded, copy-and-paste proof of my point, sparkie.
| ||
|
Thanks for the long-winded, copy-and-paste proof of my point, sparkie.
| ||
|
Yeah, you're right......I don't know why I keep hoping for a rational conversation......
|
×
×