Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

Welcome to my blog!

Democrat Party in a state of Chaos
Posted:Feb 23, 2020 9:47 am
Last Updated:Feb 23, 2020 2:27 pm
38 Views

Sen. Bernie Sanders is the projected winner of the Nevada caucus, solidifying his frontrunner status over Democratic rivals heading into the South Carolina primary and Super Tuesday.

Sanders, a card-carrying communist, is the nominee, there'll be no point in the media denying it -- and Sanders probably won't either, though crazier things have happened than a proud communist temporarily shedding his Marxist cap to win the presidency and push the nation further toward communism. The Democrat hierarchy have already started the qwest to deny Bernie the nomination. Even Chris Matthews, who has railed against Bernie’s candidacy, even suggesting an electoral slaughter, all but told this group of voters to vote for Trump. He virtually said it on live television. To be blunt, Matthews said that the Democratic Party establishment would be better off with four more of Trump than a Sanders administration and the revolutionary baggage that comes with it.

Mike Bloomberg passions for climate action and gun control track well with the Democratic Party. But his downsides, as we discovered at the first debate, are potential anchors:

--A history of vulgar comments to and about women.

--His age (7.
--His lack of human warmth.

Elizabeth Warren(Skinny Minnie) is vulnerable for her history of misrepresenting herself as a minority and for her embrace of hard-left policies. She claims to for her wish list of goodies by imposing a wealth tax that 1) might be unconstitutional; 2) would not remotely cover all her spending ideas; and 3) might dampen economic growth.

Joe Biden is older than Sanders and Bloomberg. Poor old Joe seems be displaying the early signs of dementia. His brain seems have different ideas from his tongue about where his sentences should go.

Pete Buttigieg has run the fourth-largest city in the 17th-most populous state in the U.S. His record was spotty. Crime increased by 70%.

Amy Klobuchar is rumored to be tough on her staff.
4 Comments
Ignorant and Arrogant Bloomberg Insults Farmers
Posted:Feb 19, 2020 5:04 am
Last Updated:Feb 21, 2020 7:08 pm
326 Views

I TREASURE GROWING UP IN A FARMING COMMUNITY -- This is what a farmer is: A mechanic, a plumber, an electrician, a veterinarian, a scientist, an engineer, a conservationist, an economist, an accountant, a caretaker of animals, and a planter and grower of crops, A farmer has to be all these things to survive. A farmer basically works dawn to dusk. Besides raising crops and livestock a typical farmer raises great families. A farmer cares deeply about his land, his community, the schools his are educated in, and the values that made our country great. Now put that in your hat and smoke it, Bloomberg, you globalist elitist who doesn't give a fig about our country, our working men and women, our constitution and our communities. We know you for what you are: A dwarf of a man who will sell us out to the Chinese and the internationalists if it means a few more bucks in your pocket.

Just remember Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil and you are a thousand miles from the cornfield. Dwight David Eisenhower

Here's another look at his arrogance. According to "Mini" Mike, We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly. Who is Michael Bloomberg to decide who should and should not receive health care treatments? He has a ton of money and we know he'd do everything in his power to get the best doctors and treatment available if he or his loved ones became ill. They wouldn't be told they're too old or too broke, would they?

What about those who have chronic illnesses, like diabetes or multiple sclerosis? Do they suddenly stop receiving treatment once they hit a certain age, because they're no longer deemed worthy?

And here I thought Democrats were supposed to want to take care of anybody and everybody. Guess not.
8 Comments
High School Runners Sue to Get Trans Athletes Out of Girls’ Sports
Posted:Feb 18, 2020 12:57 pm
Last Updated:Feb 20, 2020 11:29 am
369 Views

female Connecticut high school runners have had enough of losing the boys. In a lawsuit filed this week, Selina Soule, Alanna Smith, and Chelsea Mitchell are demanding that the Connecticut Association of Schools Interscholastic Athletic Conference exclude transgender athletes from girls’ sports and restore a divide based solely on inherent biological sex.

“Forcing them to compete against boys isn’t fair, shatters their dreams, and destroys their athletic opportunities,” said attorney Christiana Holcomb. “Having separate boys’ and girls’ sports has always been based on biological differences, not what people believe about their gender, because those differences matter for fair competition.

“And forcing girls to be spectators in their own sports is completely at odds with Title IX, a federal law designed to create equal opportunities for women in education and athletics,” Holcomb continued. “Connecticut’s policy violates that law and reverses nearly 50 of advances for women.”

At the center of the lawsuit are boys pretending be girls: Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood, both of whom have been in the headlines for their total domination of the Connecticut high school track scene over the past . Both are biological males competing according their “gender identity,” which is female.
In an AP interview last February, Yearwood said that her biological sex is just like any other advantage an athlete might bring the trac

“One high jumper could be taller and have longer legs than another, but the other could have perfect form, and then do better,” he said. “One sprinter could have parents who spend so much on personal training for their , which in turn, would cause that run faster.”

This is the kind of pretzel logic you have twist when you’re defending the idiotic concept that your mind – not biology – has the final truth about your gender. It doesn’t thrill us mock the arguments of a deeply-confused high school senior, but Yearwood’s logic here is the same used by any other defender of trans “rights,” be they 15 or 55. And it doesn’t make any more or less sense whether the speaker is a or an acclaimed psychiatrist.

We hope that the girls are successful in their lawsuit. Not because we’re that heavily invested in the Connecticut high school running scene, but because we’re talking about basic matters of truth and fiction. More than any other time that we can remember, the transgender movement has unmoored us from scientific rationality and thrown us into a world of fantasy and fairy tales.

The lawsuit was filed against the Connecticut Association of Schools-Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference and the boards of education in Bloomfield, Cromwell, Glastonbury, Canton and Danbury.

A country that can be convinced that girls can be boys and vice-versa can be convinced of anything. The viability of Western civilization going forward may very well be determined by when and if people stand up on this issue and say, “Okay, sorry, but you lost me.”

From Associated Press
11 Comments
Virginia Gun Ban Fails in Senate Committee
Posted:Feb 17, 2020 7:16 pm
Last Updated:Feb 18, 2020 2:26 am
367 Views

The gun bill backed by Gov. Ralph Northam (D-VA) that included sweeping bans of guns, magazines, and suppressors – turning gun owners in the state into criminals overnight – was rejected by a senate committee.

Cam Edwards of Bearing Arms reported that four Democrats joined every Republican on the committee to send the bill to the Virginia Crime Commission for further study, which means it won’t be reconsidered before this legislative session expires.

“The gun ban bill was the first on the docket for the Judiciary Committee, and GOP members grilled bill sponsor Del. Mark Levine over his definition of an ‘assault weapon,’ the arbitrary ban on ammunition magazines that can hold more than rounds, and other aspects of the legislation,” Edwards wrote.

As The Daily Wire reported, Levine failed to get even one fact about guns correct during a previous explanation of his definition of “assault weapon.” During his -minute explanation earlier, Levine “mimicked what he claimed mass shooters like to use. His body language suggested he was using a fully automatic weapon (he twisted at the hips like he was in some old gangster movie). Fully automatic weapons are not used in mass shootings because they’ve been banned since 1986. Democrats and their media allies like to claim “semi-automatic” is virtually the same as fully automatic, but they’re not. A fully automatic weapon means it reloads and fires repeatedly with one trigger pull. Semi-automatic weapons fire one round trigger pull.”

“‘This weapons restriction is clearly constitutional,’ claimed Levine, noting that in a challenge to a similar ban in Maryland, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals declared that so-called assault weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment. What Levine didn’t say is that the U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t taken up a case dealing with semi-automatic long guns,” Edwards continued.

Levine insisted that the bill narrowly passed by the Virginia House of Delegates would not “infringe on anyone’s rights,” even though it absolutely would, banning Americans from purchasing certain firearms, magazines, and suppressors that had been previously legal to purchase and turning lawful gun owners into criminals overnight if they continued to keep any newly banned magazines they had previously purchased legally. More from Edwards:

While the gun, magazine, and suppressor bill is dead for this legislative session, it will almost surely be back again next year, and in the meantime Gov. Northam will likely get a chance to sign several gun control , including measures that would roll back the state’s firearm preemption law, change training requirements for concealed carry licensees, and more.

Still, Virginia gun owners can rightfully be pleased and proud that their activism and engagement helped to defeat HB961, which was the centerpiece of Gov. Northam’s anti-gun agenda. Even as the bill was watered down to attract the support of House Democrats, four Democrats in the state Senate (the three mentioned above as well as Sen. Lywood Lewis) continued to voice their concern or reservations about the legislation.

Republicans won’t have a chance to vote gun-grabbing Democrats out of office until 2021, but their activism won’t likely dissipate if the bill is brought up again next year.

By Ashe Schow
3 Comments
Jane Fonda is getting $83,000 to speak at the Kent State May 4th Commemoration.
Posted:Feb 17, 2020 5:18 am
Last Updated:Feb 19, 2020 3:07 am
503 Views

And that’s a disgrace.

The 50th anniversary of one of Ohio’s darkest days has the potential to serve as a moment of unity, understanding & healing in a nation that is deeply divided. However, Kent State’s decision to Jane Fonda $83,000 to speak at their commemoration event does the very opposite.

I served years in the US Army, and eight years in the Ohio Senate before becoming Secretary of State. I certainly understand that people disagree on policy issues, especially matters of war -- and that’s ok. What’s not ok is providing aid and comfort to the enemy and willfully serving as a propaganda tool for those engaged in hostilities against the United States. And Ms. Fonda did that – the very definition of treason.

American service members coming home from Vietnam deserved a much better reception than the one they received. They weren’t the politicians chose which battle to fight -- they were the soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines sent into the battle. And we should say one thing to them: Welcome Home.

There’s still time to make the 50th anniversary commemoration of this awful day one that can be inclusive and educational for Ohioans, Americans and the world. I urge Kent State University to immediately rescind their invitation to Ms. Fonda.

By Frank LaRose Secretary of State Ohio ·Sunday, February , 2020
8 Comments
A Great Question
Posted:Feb 15, 2020 11:41 am
Last Updated:Feb 20, 2020 6:46 am
869 Views

It’s a question that Democrats can’t answer or are unwilling to defend. And it was asked in the bastion of liberal America. Why do Democrats care more about illegal aliens than homeless Americans in the streets? It’s a question that Scot Presler, the man whose been volunteering to clean up the garbage that’s accumulated in Democrat-run cities, asked of San Francisco residents. Yes, the crowd around him wasn’t big, but the question is still salient. Why is this the case? The Democratic Party is keen on expanding sanctuary policies, giving illegals health care and driver’s licenses—but what about the homeless? On the West Coast or Left Coast, homeless people are becoming a hallmark characteristic. Presler noted that California is one of the biggest state economies in the country, but Sacramento would rather cater to illegals instead. California is a sanctuary state.

Presler had organized a clean-up of Baltimore, which he wrote about in an op-ed for the Sun last August:

While our volunteers were inspired to pick up trash, we knew this had to be more than just a Band-Aid. So, we took the opportunity to zip our mouths and listen to the residents. Louise, 81-years-old and 4-foot-10 inches tall, took me the hand to show me where her neighborhood needs . She told me how people from outside the city are illegally dumping trash at the “bandos,” or abandoned buildings. Even worse, Louise said that the city only sends a truck once a year to clean out the alleys.

A grandmother ran out to us after seeing reports of the cleanup on the news. She has sent videos of vehicles illegally dumping in the area, but the city has not taken action. I gave her cell and promised to post any videos she sends me all over social media so we can combat this illegal trash dumping. I also encouraged her to knock on every one of her neighbors’ doors to tell the city how they feel.

In addition to the grandmother, I promised Louise that we would return. On Monday, Sept. 9, we are coming back to Baltimore cleanup #2. We would like to cordially invite The Baltimore Sun to join our efforts and pick up trash.

Here is the tweet he sent to Speaker Pelosi:

Dear @SpeakerPelosi,

name is Scott Presler.

While you’re ripping up President @realDonaldTrump’s speech,

I traveled to your district in San Francisco a trash cleanup.

I find it amazing you care more about pens & paper than constituents.#SOTU

Sadly, Scot, the proof is in the pudding. Democrats don’t care. They never have about the homeless. Caring the homeless vs. the long-term goal of creating new voters—that’s what’s being weighed, and Democrats favor the latter.

From article Matt Vespa
29 Comments
Trump Hater Mistakes Red Cap For MAGA Hat, Punches Ex-NYPD Cop’s Face
Posted:Feb 13, 2020 12:39 pm
Last Updated:Feb 16, 2020 11:54 am
752 Views

A former NYPD detective who was celebrating his 50th birthday in Nashville, Tennessee was sucker-punched a woman who thought his red cap was a MAGA hat.

Staten Island resident Daniel Sprague was talking with his wife and friends at a bar called The Stage in downtown Nashville when a stranger spun him around and hit him in the face, shouting, “How dare you?”

“I was outside with friends when some grabbed me from behind, spun me around and punched me in the face,” Sprague said.

On FB, Sprague wrote, “A misguided soul possibly not alone, who I’m assuming was not very literate, spun me around, punch (sic) me in the face and grabbing (sic) hat while she was yelling ‘how dare you’ leading me to think she thought it was a MAGA hat.”

However, the hat actually read, “Make Fifty Great Again,” to commemorate Daniel’s birthday.
He was also wearing a t-shirt that said, “Making America Great Since 70.”

When the woman hit Sprague, she may have been wearing a ring or holding a key because it left a gash in his cheek that was “pretty deep and goes to the bone.”
“She has issues, I feel bad her,” he told WSMV.

Sprague and the assailant were escorted out of the bar bouncers before he could call the police, but he did file a report the following day.

The former NYPD cop did say The Stage is a “great bar with great security and very professional.”

Touching on the political climate that likely led to the attack, Sprague told WSMV, “This is wrong,” and said people can’t just go around assaulting others “because somebody has a political opinion that doesn’t match theirs.”
“I love Trump, but I wouldn’t hit someone who had a Bernie hat on,” he added.

The Metropolitan Nashville Police Department confirmed they received Sprague’s report and he’s currently waiting to hear back from detectives.

From nfowars
6 Comments
Petulant Nancy Pelosi is everything wrong with Democratic Party
Posted:Feb 11, 2020 4:03 am
Last Updated:Feb 11, 2020 3:11 pm
812 Views

Nancy Pelosi looked like a malfunctioning Stepford wife as she sat behind President Trump during his State of the Union address last week. Her lower face twitched, she muttered to herself, shook her head, smiled inappropriately, gazed around, chewed her lip or remained glued to her seat during standing ovations in honor of special guests.

It was a bizarre enough performance before she rose to her feet and dramatically ripped up her copy of the president’s speech in what will go down in history as the most unseemly display of partisanship in this partisan era.

That moment was when the myth of the “master political strategist” was busted, and we saw Pelosi, 79, for what she is. Pretending to be classy and prayerful when she is full of petty hatreds and is incapable of holding her party together, a woman who parades her Catholicism while advocating no-holds-barred abortions, feigning to pray for the president while deriding him as “sedated.”

As the leader of the Democrats until they select a presidential candidate, Pelosi is everything that is wrong with the party.

She told reporters that ripping up the speech was “a very dignified act … the courteous thing to do, considering some of the other exuberances within me.”

But her petulant vandalism was the opposite of courteous, quite obviously.
It only underscored the desperation of a party that has lurched to the left in pursuit of Bernie Sanders’ supporters, as the president reaps the reward of a booming economy and his opponents’ continual miscalculations.

Pelosi showed no contrition for ripping up the speech, nor for the political catastrophe of her failed impeachment drive.

That failure is the albatross around the neck of her party’s presidential candidates as they flail their way through icy New Hampshire.
Bereft of economic ideas, they are reduced to espousing electorally unpalatable policy positions: radical abortion, gender quotas in the cabinet, wholesale drug legalization and the kind of criminal justice reform that has turbo-charged crime in New York

If Pelosi meant to delay handing over the impeachment articles to the Senate as a strategic masterstroke to tie up ascendant socialist Sanders in the Senate and give Joe Biden three weeks on his own in Iowa, that, too, backfired big-time.

The more Iowa saw of Biden, the less they wanted him, and the candidate who benefited most from those moderate votes was Pete Buttigieg, who has done a good job of disguising his radical views on the campaign trail.

The former South Bend, Ind., mayor said last month that there’s no place for pro-lifers in the Democratic Party, and claimed the Bible says a baby’s life begins with “breath.”

In Concord, NH, Saturday, he was vaguer when asked about the comment.

“We’re a big tent … What I’m not going to do is get someone’s vote by tricking them.”

But Sanders was less coy: “Being pro-choice is an absolutely essential part of being a Democrat.”

Like Biden, Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren and Andrew Yang, Sanders wants to enact a “litmus test” for judicial appointments:

“I will never nominate anybody who is not 100 percent pro-Roe v. Wade.”

But most Democrats don’t share these intolerant views. As Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life of America, who challenged Buttigieg in a live Fox News town hall last month over his pro-abortion stance, points out, 59 percent of Democrats support restrictions on abortion.

With Mike Bloomberg waiting in the wings, maybe the candidates in New Hampshire have thrown caution to the wind in the hope of stopping Sanders.

But there’s one metric that tells you why Democrats are so morose: the president’s job approval ratings among nonwhites, according to Gallup.

That group, thought to be a lock for Democrats, is coming loose. Approval of Trump by all voters is at 49 percent, the highest of his presidency and higher than for Barack Obama (45 percent) at the same point in his presidency.

Trump has gained 10 points since impeachment began in October. Nice one, Nancy.

But nonwhites’ approval of Trump also is at a high: 28 percent, up 10 points in a year.

When it comes to Trump’s handling of the economy, he gets 67 percent overall job approval and a resounding 49 percent among nonwhites, the beneficiaries of lower unemployment and higher wages.

So almost half of all black and Hispanic voters think Trump is doing a good job with the economy. That makes him hard to beat.

As well, 23 percent of nonwhites say Trump deserves to be re-elected, 13 percent say they will vote for him regardless of who the Democratic nominee is and 36 percent will decide once they see whom the Democrats choose.

The Democrats’ counteroffer is unpalatable social policy and tantrums from Pelosi.

Hating Trump is not enough, as you can tell from the subdued applause in New Hampshire when candidates rip into the president.

Andrew Yang may be lagging behind the field of Democratic presidential candidates in New Hampshire, but he is the only one with a clear-eyed view of his ultimate potential opponent.

“Why is Donald Trump our president?” he asked 7,000 Democrats on Saturday night at the McIntyre-Shaheen 100 Club gala dinner in Manchester.

“It’s not Russia. He is our president because we lost 4 million manufacturing jobs in Ohio, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania [and] New Hampshire. Those towns have never recovered.

“We make a mistake when we say Donald Trump is the source of all our problems. He’s not. He is the symptom of a disease.”

Elizabeth Warren, "Skinny Minnie", who launched her academic career by falsely posing as a Native American to get favorable treatment at Harvard, would make Martin Luther King roll over in his grave with her push for “race-conscious laws.”
No surprise, then, that she is in denial about race problems in her own campaign. Asked about why six “women of color” quit her Nevada campaign, complaining of tokenism and a “toxic work environment,” Warren told MSNBC it was the fault of America’s “long legacy” of “racism and oppression [which] creates the kinds of toxicity where … people take advantage of other people.” Huh?

OP-ED by Miranda Devine 2-9-2020 New York Post
2 Comments
Tulsi Gabbard Defends Trump Firing Vindman Brothers, Sondland
Posted:Feb 10, 2020 7:24 pm
Last Updated:Feb 11, 2020 3:12 pm
847 Views

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-) defended President Donald Trump’s decision to fire two brothers the National Security Council (NSC) and an ambassador on Friday in an interview on Fox News.

Late on Friday, news broke that the Trump administration removed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and attorney Yevgeny Vindman from the NSC, and also recalled U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland.

“You know, the president yesterday, as you probably know, Congresswoman, fired Gordon Sondland, our Ambassador to Ukraine, and Alexander Vindman, top security official,” host Neil Cavuto said. “A lot of people were likening it to another, you know, Friday night massacre akin to what Richard Nixon did back in the ‘70s. Do you agree with that?”

“Ultimately, whether people like or not, there are consequences to elections,” Gabbard responded. “And the president has, within his purview, to make the decisions about who he’d like serving in his cabinet.”

At an earlier point in the interview, Gabbard took aim at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg when asked what she thought about the DNC making the rules easier for Bloomberg to qualify for the debates.

“It’s wrong. It’s wrong,” Gabbard responded. “The fact that a billionaire can come in and have that kind of influence to change the rules of the DNC all of a sudden, not coincidently, to be able to benefit Michael Bloomberg while voters here in New Hampshire and across the country are saying, hey, we want to be able to make the best informed decision possible before we go in and cast our vote, understanding the seriousness of this election.”

“But they’re not able to do so so long as both the DNC and some of the corporate media partners are enacting these rules where they are playing favorites,” Gabbard responded. “They are picking winners and losers before voters have the opportunity to do so.”

By Daily Wire News
3 Comments
Democrats war on GOP and President just getting started
Posted:Feb 5, 2020 7:03 am
Last Updated:Feb 6, 2020 7:12 pm
1021 Views

Just because the Senate is about acquit President Trump of charges Republicans believed never rose the level of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” don’t think Democrats will raise the white flag of surrender. They (and their media allies) have only just begun.

Next is a campaign defeat enough of the 23 Republican senators up for re-election and, if possible (it doesn’t look possible, but this is February), keep President Trump from winning reelection.

Democrats have virtually no issues on which to run, except the promise of free stuff — from Elizabeth Warren’s student loan forgiveness plan, which does nothing for those who struggled to off their student loans without assistance, Bernie Sanders’ free "Medicare for All."

A new Gallup poll released last week shows how difficult it will be for Democrats.
According Gallup, 41 percent of Americans “are satisfied with the way things are going in the U.S.” That’s the highest satisfaction level in 15 . Seventy- percent of Republicans are satisfied, a number likely grow if the economy remains strong and there is stability in international affairs.

Only percent of Democrats are satisfied. That is likely, in part, because President Trump is racking up success after success without any cooperation from the other party. If Democrats had cooperated on at least some issues (other than the new trade agreement between the U.S., Canada and Mexico) they might have been able legitimately claim some credit, but their opposition all things Trump and their attempts undo the results of the 2016 election leaves them out in the political cold.

What is most remarkable about this Gallup poll is that it was taken in the middle of the Senate impeachment trial and in the face of some of the most hostile media coverage any president has ever had endure in modern times.

According the conservative Media Research Center, which monitors the broadcast network’s evening news programs, “… evening news coverage of the opening arguments of both sides, found ABC, CBS, and NBC did not live up to the standard they demanded of Republicans. They gave Democrats double the airtime and showered their arguments with mostly praise, while expressing only criticism of the President’s legal team.”

The New York Times and Washington Post have cast aside any cloak of fairness by going anti-Trump nonstop. Their news coverage, editorials and virtually all of their columnists are constantly looking for new ways to express opposition to and hatred of the president. One advantage for readers is that it is easier to get through those papers because they have become predictable and tiresome.

Democrats may feel good about this as they keep company with their media fellow travelers, but President Trump is newly empowered to take his case for four more of prosperity and relative peace the public. Every Democrat running for president would raise taxes, giving more Washington, which cannot constrain its spending lust under either party. As taxes rise, so would unemployment because many businesses would no longer be able to afford workers they hired during the economic boom.

Look for more investigations — perhaps additional allegations and articles of impeachment — and more “leaks” from former Trump staffers between now and the election. The only way to stop this is for Republicans to regain a House majority and maintain their majority in the Senate.

Barring an unforeseeable disaster (always a possibility), Trump is positioned to win re-election, perhaps in a landslide, which will send the left and most of the media into another deep depression.

Op-Ed by Cal Thomas
12 Comments

To link to this blog (bigblock46) use [blog bigblock46] in your messages.