Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

Welcome to my blog!

Message for Pelosi, McConnell, Kasich and Romney
Posted:Oct 19, 2019 7:22 am
Last Updated:Oct 20, 2019 5:02 pm
67 Views

It seems me you four along with many others are more interested in protecting the borders in Syria than in the country you live in. You people have ignored immigration reform along with the flow of illegal drugs from our Southern Borders damn long. You took an oath to defend this country against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Well shirking your duties seems to be your pastime. We have a Pencil Necked Adam Schiff who has made it his mission to investigate investigations, a Half Witted Maxine Waters who has been screaming impeachment since November 9, 2016. All the while close to or over 100,000 Americans die from drug overdoses every single year and the flow comes from our Southern Borders. Yet you scream about protecting a border of a country most people can't find on a map. I point out our Southern Border with Mexico goes along the following states California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. Schiff and Waters both represent one of the four mentioned states.

I know that these people will not see this and if you express the same to your Congressman or woman they will ignore it also. I say everyone should take the time to send your Representative a similar type letter and see if they respond. Mine did not and I am quite happy to inform her she just lost a vote. It seems to me if they are more interested in protecting the border in Syria than protecting you the American Citizen they don't have any business in Congress and should be sent home and have to actually live with the laws they had a hand in writing.
6 Comments
Hillary Clinton slanders Tulsi Gabbard by calling her Russian asset
Posted:Oct 19, 2019 3:25 am
Last Updated:Oct 20, 2019 11:11 am
67 Views

Hillary Clinton in a new interview appeared to float a conspiracy theory that the Russians are “grooming” Hawaii congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard to be a third-party candidate in 2020, while claiming 20 Green Party nominee Jill Stein is "also" a Russian asset.

Appearing on former President Obama aide David Plouffe’s “Campaign HQ” podcast, Clinton did not mention Gabbard specifically by , though Plouffe ended the podcast by noting Clinton’s “belief that Tulsi Gabbard is going to be a third-party candidate propped up by Trump and the Russians.

“I'm not making any predictions but I think they've got their eye on somebody is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said, in apparent reference to Gabbard. “She's the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

She then accused Stein, ran against her and Donald Trump in 20, of also being an asset of Russia: "That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset."

Other Democrats have made similar claims about Gabbard, a Hawaii Democratic congresswoman and Hawaii Army National Guard major served in Iraq. For her part, during this week’s presidential debate in Ohio, Gabbard fired back at those accusing her of this.

"Just two days ago, The New York Times put an article saying that I'm a Russian asset and an Assad apologist and all these different smears,” Gabbard said. “This morning, a CNN commentator said on national television that I'm an asset of Russia — completely despicable."

Gabbard has repeatedly been accused by Democrats of being a "puppet for the Russian government." Gabbard – an anti-war activist has accused the United States of waging a "regime change war” in Syria – has had to defend her 20 meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the brutal dictator, throughout the campaign.

Others on Friday expressed fear that Gabbard would run as a third-party candidate, helping Trump in his reelection.

"If @TulsiGabbard runs, it would be a huge windfall for Trump, Assad, Putin, Xi,” former U.N. ambassador Samantha Power tweeted in response to Clinton’s comments.

From Fox News
5 Comments
2020 Election: Mike Rowe Burns Democrats With His Post-Debate Observations
Posted:Oct 18, 2019 4:24 am
Last Updated:Oct 18, 2019 7:02 pm
87 Views

It may not have been the most exciting debate. The September debate was filled with more swipes at one another, but the Democratic debate Tuesday night once again showed how insane this party has become. One could see why impeachment is on the minds of Democrats; it may be the only way to beat Trump in 2020. Trump has an agenda of fewer regulations, tax cuts, a booming economy, over three million new jobs, bigger paychecks, and record unemployment across the board. The Democrats want to increase taxes, wreck capitalism, torch the economy, confiscate guns, give illegal aliens health care, and cannibalize private health insurance. On the latter, it’s the only way for Medicare for All to work.

The top of the 2020 crop is a democratic socialist just had a heart attack, a fake Indian can’t answer the simple question about whether her health care plan will jack up middle-class taxes, and a former vice president is beyond incoherent. They’re also all very, very old. It’s like Night of the Living Dead. Of course, Warren’s health care plan would increase taxes. Everyone’s taxes will go up and she knows that. Hence, her prevarication on the subject. And Warren was treated like the frontrunner Tuesday night. It did not go well; she was raked over the coals for her vague health care remarks. Biden didn’t fare much better and he’s emerging as one of the weakest frontrunners to run for the presidency in recent memory. There’s a reason why he never reached such status in past presidential bids; he’s just not that good. And 85 percent of the reason why he was atop of the polls was due to recognition. After his serial gaffes on the trail, I think there are a lot of Democratic voters having second thoughts. Yet, Mike Rowe, the former host of the popular show Dirty Jobs and narrator for Discovery’s Deadliest Catch, had the most brutal observation about that night.

The entire field talked about the rich, also known as the job-creating and investing class, as some boogeyman, working hard to screw over working-class America. Funny—the Democratic agenda would do just that, but I digress. Everyone on stage is rich or pretty damn comfortable. So, in all, it was a debate where millionaires were fighting over hates…other rich the most. The Washington Times has more:

American “everyman” Mike Rowe says Democrats sometimes came across as millionaire candidates arguing over “hates the millionaires the most” during Tuesday’s primary debate.

The author, celebrity, and man behind Work Ethic Scholarships given each year by the mikeroweWORKS Foundation told “Fox & Friends” that some of the ideas presented in Ohio among presidential hopefuls to humanity’s worst instincts.

“It’s a free country. Float ‘em. Fly ‘em,” he said of Sen. Bernard Sanders’ plan to tax the 400 richest Americans at a 97% rate. “Run ‘em up the old flagpole. See salutes. Look, in the end you’ve got millionaires arguing with millionaires over hates the millionaires the most.”

It’s just amazing that liberal America actually thinks their ideas are popular. Decriminalizing border crossings are not popular, and neither is letting MS- roam free thanks for sanctuary city policies. But yeah, this limousine liberal observation was spot on—and it has been true for quite some time. Voters may not like Trump, but we’re seeing a rather explicit distinction among the two sides. We have a future that encourages freedom and another that seeks to turn the authoritarian progressive project into a reality. Freedom vs. slavery…I wonder would win that contest.

Article by Matt Vespa
7 Comments
Focus group: These Ohio swing voters are outraged over impeachment
Posted:Oct 15, 2019 6:13 am
Last Updated:Oct 17, 2019 7:43 am
154 Views

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio — Swing voters in this Rust Belt state are expressing a range of unease about impeaching President Trump, from fears it will hurt the economy to frustrations that House Democrats are more invested in going after Trump than in helping people.

Why it matters: If such sentiments last and play out on a larger scale across pivotal states, it spells trouble for Democrats unless they can reframe what they're trying to accomplish.

Distraction, unease, exhaustion — these were some of the main takeaways from our engagious/FPG focus group last week.

We heard from 8 voters who flipped from Barack Obama in 2012 to Trump in 2016, and 3 who switched from Mitt Romney to Hillary Clinton.

The findings are a counterpoint to the latest national surveys — including a Fox News poll — that show more and more Americans, perhaps even a majority, now favor impeaching and removing Trump.

While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, these responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about the 2020 election in crucial counties.

The big picture: 9 of the 11 participants raised their hands to say impeachment is a distraction from the issues they care most about — things like wages and unemployment, border security, bringing troops home, and health care costs and access.

Brad P., a 40-year-old Trump voter, summed it up as "a never-ending drama" that "shows to me these people are completely out of touch with everyday Americans’ lives."

A couple of people doubted that Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden; others didn't think it warrants impeachment if he did. "Is there undeniable proof?" asked one man.

When asked how impeachment made them feel, these voters offered things like "concerned," "uneasy," "exhausted," "sad that they’re [Democrats] so focused on it," and "a big distraction from what we could be doing."

One person, Lisa A., who was a Clinton voter, didn't think it was a great idea but said, "I believe in the checks and balances" and "I'm not scared of the process."

Why Ohio matters: Trump won the state in 2016 by over 450,000 votes; he lost Mahoning County, where the focus group was held, by less than 4,000 votes.

What they're saying: Participants shared their thoughts about the Democrats. "They need to focus on the real issues," said Judy D., a 60-year-old Trump voter. "[Nancy] Pelosi hates him so bad, I just think she needs to drop it and worry about the country."

“They need to be concentrating on the country, not what he’s doing wrong,” Deborah G., a 56-year-old Clinton voter, said.

"They hit a big strike on Mueller, so this is trying to get another base hit on the president,” said Eric B., a 34-year-old Trump voter.

"It's become more of ... 'Destroy the other party' instead of build the whole country up," said Richelle W., a 40-year-old Trump voter.

Before getting serious about impeachment, House Democrats worried the timing was too close to the 2020 election and could backfire at the polls.

One man, Rocco P., a 40-year-old Trump voter, offered this advice to Democrats: "Just drop it. Beat Trump at the ballot box."

Between the lines: Harboring anti-impeachment feelings doesn't necessarily translate to a vote for Trump in 2020. Only four of the participants said they will definitely vote for Trump again; one former Trump voter said he will vote for Andrew Yang; one Clinton voter, Lisa A., said she's leaning toward Elizabeth Warren; and the rest are undecided.

From Axios October 14 2019 author Alexi McCammond
14 Comments
Democrats using Intel Committee to keep impeachment facts hidden from the public
Posted:Oct 14, 2019 4:57 am
Last Updated:Oct 14, 2019 7:10 pm
111 Views

Congressional Democrats are skirting the past precedent of using the Judiciary Committee to impeach the president, and are instead relying on the House Intelligence Committee to shroud their work in darkness and keep vital facts hidden from the public, said Wall Street Journal columnist Kim Strassel.

"I think the reason they are doing it through House Intelligence is so that they can keep everything secret, keep this whistleblower identity secret and the nature of some of the claims," she claimed Sunday on "The Journal Editorial Report."
"But that’s not very encouraging to the public," Strassel continued. "I think the other thing they’re doing is not holding a formal vote to have an impeachment inquiry and setting out the rules -- they’ve been denying Republicans the right to take part in some of this. These are all at variance with what past probes have done."

Strassel also said Democrats have obstructed the White House from participating in the impeachment process and have completely ignored past precedent and normal decorum.

"The House is not following the usual procedures, not allowing the White House to take part in things like asking witnesses questions or cross-examining them or calling them," she said.

"Since impeachment is a political tool, the goal of it is to convince the public that you are doing things in a fair and just manner, and they’re certainly not, because they’re not abiding by any of the past courtesies or standards that impeachment probes use."

From article by Nick Givas
7 Comments
Virginia Democrats are a total mess
Posted:Oct 12, 2019 5:27 am
Last Updated:Oct 12, 2019 6:21 pm
123 Views

Virginia turned down hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal used combat gun crime in 2018, rather than comply with federal immigration authorities, according documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

A series of Department of Justice memos show that two anti-gun-crime grants were transferred from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS), which had previously administered the program, in Dec. 2018. The memos say the transfer was necessary after state officials refused to certify that Virginia would comply with federal requirements to share immigration information with federal law enforcement.

"DCJS will not be able to comply with the requirements and the agency has formally declined the awards," a DOJ official said in one memo. "The grants were awarded to the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) to serve as the fiscal agent for the 2018 Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN) awards for the Eastern and Western Districts of the state of Virginia."
Democratic governor Ralph Northam, a supporter of gun control reforms, and his administration lost out on $665,673 in grant funding that is specifically aimed at reducing gun crimes. The grants are now administered through the non-profit Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police. A Northam spokeswoman declined to comment on the transfer but said the governor supports the program and how the non-profit has handled it.

Virginia Democrats are a total mess. Yes, it may not be reported extensively now, but Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam wore blackface in the 1980s. The state attorney general, Mark Herring, also did it. And Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax is facing two allegations of ra&e. The entire Democratic leadership was engulfed in scandal, but no one has resigned because Democrats by a separate set of rules. You can be racist, be a Democrat, and survive. The state was the laughingstock of the country for a few news cycles, but now Impeachment Theater is taking the Hill by storm because Trump had a phone call with the Ukrainians. It’s a total hit job—what else is new—but back to the Old Dominion.

The Democratic Party is pro-open borders on immigration. We have 2020 candidates discussing decriminalizing border crossings and giving health care to illegal aliens. Oh, and they hate Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. It is part of their overall animosity towards law enforcement due to the Black Lives Matter nonsense, and yet they think these are the only people who should be trusted with firearms. That animus is so great that it appears state Democrats rejected government funds to fight gun crime because of the provision to share immigration data with federal law enforcement authorities.

From article by Matt Vespa
4 Comments
He Fights for All Americans
Posted:Oct 10, 2019 3:24 am
Last Updated:Oct 14, 2019 4:41 am
447 Views

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”

Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.

We tried statesmanship.

Could there be another human being on this earth so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?

We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?

And the results were always the . This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party.

I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks.

I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent.

Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the of the ‘60's. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today.

The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety.

With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War.

During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed of the Army for conduct unbecoming.

Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today.

Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”

General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”

That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis.

It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN.. He made it personal.

Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. ... They need to respond.

This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive.

Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church.

Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.

So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do.

These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years.

So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America

By Evan Sayet
32 Comments
Answer to Yesterdays Question
Posted:Oct 9, 2019 8:09 am
Last Updated:Oct 14, 2019 4:41 am
219 Views

Yesterday I posted a question of the following:

Whose campaign platform is the following?

1-increased military spending

2-increased spending on hi-tech weaponry

3-increased funding for space exploration

4-pro-life

5-pro-abstinence

6-lower corporate tax

7-decrease capital gains

I got snide remarks rather than just answering the question.

Well the answer is the Democrat Party of 1960 and John F Kennedy
17 Comments
A Question for All
Posted:Oct 8, 2019 5:48 am
Last Updated:Oct 14, 2019 4:42 am
207 Views

Whose campaign platform is the following?

1-increased military spending

2-increased spending on hi-tech weaponry

3-increased funding for space exploration

4-pro-life

5-pro-abstinence

6-lower corporate tax

7-decrease capital gains

Please keep remarks civil. I will give the answer tomorrow.
6 Comments
Lib Media Savaged Clinton-Era Whistleblower Linda Tripp
Posted:Oct 7, 2019 8:17 am
Last Updated:Oct 9, 2019 9:38 am
231 Views

The anonymous whistleblower who complained about President Trump’s July phone conversation with the leader of Ukraine is being touted and toasted across the liberal media, but it was a far different story 21 years ago when a Pentagon employee named Linda Tripp helped bring Clinton’s perjury and obstruction of justice to the attention of Independent Counsel Ken Starr.

For daring to undermine a Democratic President, the media had nothing but contempt for Tripp, who journalists disdained as a “pathetic, self-destroying older loser,” a “spy-provacateur,” and a “treacherous, back-stabbing, good-for-nothing enemy of the truth.” Time’s Margaret Carlson said Tripp “lost membership in the family of man” recording her phone conversations with Clinton’s paramour, Monica Lewinsky. CNBC’s Geraldo Rivera said Tripp was a “betrayer on the order of Benedict Arnold,” while Newsweek tagged her a “friend-betraying Cruella de Vil.”

In an online poll, ABCNews put Tripp in the same league as mass butchers Slobodan Milosevic, Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Even after impeachment, journalists felt comfortable using Tripp’s name as an epithet, as when NBC’s Katie Couric scolded George Stephanopoulos as “kinda creepy... a Linda-Tripp type,” because his memoir included too much personal information about Clinton: “You’re airing all the dirty laundry, and some people just think that’s sorta gross.”

While the media are in full fret mode about the imagined consequences that might befall the Trump whistleblower if his (or her) name is publicized, it’s a matter of fact that Clinton’s Democratic administration took vindictive steps against Tripp. Pentagon spokesman (and former Wall Street Journal reporter) Kenneth Bacon and his aide leaked confidential personnel information about Tripp to The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer for a hit piece. Most of the media yawned. Years later, the government Tripp $595,000 to settle the case.
13 Comments

To link to this blog (bigblock46) use [blog bigblock46] in your messages.