Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

When does BAD, get BAD enough?
Posted:Mar 20, 2018 11:40 am
Last Updated:Mar 20, 2018 11:30 pm

Well, it seems for many, as long as you have different choice about Trump.. It will NEVER get BAD enough..

It seems that as long a one can move the line. It will never get BAD enough.

For many of US, Trump has crossed the line too many times on too many different things for it NOT to be BAD enough already. The choices we once could make...That make it not so BAD, have been taken away.

Still there are those who make choices and move the line of what is BAD.

Is it too much to ask.. to stop moving the line.. to finally draw a line that is set in stone...

These people do it so easily with others.......Hillary, Obama, Liberals, Atheists, LGBT's, people of color, and foreigners. They set a bar that 's impossible to overcome......yet move that bar when it comes to Trump.

When is it NOT about politics? When does politics have a bottom line?

The things that have happen with Trump when we remove the politics of it...Are so BAD, It's just impossible... for those of US who have a bottom line to overcome.

I can't get a handle on Hillary.. don't know for sure It could be or it may not be.
But what I do know... is it doesn't matter now..
But with Obama.....It was just the opposite.. It's ALL politics... The right or wrong of it was all a political view of Obama, certainly it could be politically individualized as right or wrong...., but not the Lying, offensive, manipulative, evil, personal nature that Trump presents with or without a political view.
Categorically.. TRUMP IS BAD...the question is..why isn't he BAD enough?
Why Trump and the Republican need to stay in power..
Posted:Mar 18, 2018 9:37 am
Last Updated:Mar 18, 2018 12:19 pm

Today a republican pundit.. said the economy will ultimately. rule the the favor of trump supporters

Well, I agree and disagree...

Where I disagree is in the fickled nature of American psyche..
First's not unusual for people to not care about ..what they already have and only care about what they want.. So as Trump says how great the economy is doing, he is devaluing the perception of his own need. The more people agree with him... the less important it becomes.
We've gone through a transition from Bush to Obama....In which economy was the primary focus..Bush was the start... and Obama the continuation..
However... the truth be known.. that there is an overlap of Bush to Obama, and the delayed economy reaction. The economy has no immediate long term reaction .government simply has the power for short term fixes.. The results of which become the burden of future administrations..

so what we can gather from this.. is the the "bad" economy of Bush,, becomes the "bad" economy of Obama, and conversely the good economy of Obama becomes the good economy of Trump.
Trump has used short term fixes to improve the economy of Obama.. which, in fact, is a lot easier to do in an improving economy.. than short term fixes in a depressed economy.

To the point.... do you believe our economy will get "better" under Trump than it is now? or do you believe at some point it will have to get worse?.. i believe the latter..
I believe the long term consequences of the current economic condition is unsustainable. I believe the agenda of deregulation, tax cuts cuts, protectionism and short term improvements will eventually catch up to a down turn.

The point of the blog.. and why trump needs to stay in power.. Politics in this country is a bunch of lies..
Where the cook always gets blamed... instead of the ingredients and the preparer.
Removing Trump and then having the subsequent economy downfall.. WILL BE BLAMED ON THE DEMOCRATS...Yet, if that down turn happens during the Trump administration.. there will be no room for LIES.
The economy.. will again become the focal point of the electorate, but his time, there will only be ONE party to blame..

Impossibility, Possibility, Probability and Fact.
Posted:Mar 18, 2018 8:50 am
Last Updated:Mar 19, 2018 9:30 am

First let me define those I see them.

"Impossibility".. there is NO evidence
"Possibility".. there is some evidence
"Probability".. there is significant evidence
"Fact"....There is No evidence to the contrary...

"Evidence"......the truth

Almost all conspiracy theorist deal with possibility...Interpreting some of the evidence to conclude a conspiracy.

the ideas between possibility and probability have always been gray.. How much evidence does it take to turn a possibility into a probability..?

when we deal with "impossibility and "fact".. the evidence is clear...what makes the definition unclear is the Truth...

Fact...the Russian interfered with the election.
Possibility... Trump colluded with the Russians

What we hear from Trump.. is the impossibility of collusion.... which in turn denies the fact of Russian interference.. For Trump it goes hand in hand.... basically Trump has said you can't have Russian interference unless you can prove collusion.

Once one understands Trump position and denies Russian interference as a fact..then it is only logical that Trump, himself, has change the possibility of collusion.. into the probability of collusion.

Trump's attorney stated yesterday ...the "alleged" Russian interference.. He was denying the fact of Russian interference for the sole purpose of denying the possibility of collusion. Which conversely states if Russian interference is a fact... then collusion is a fact.
Enemy identification.
Posted:Mar 16, 2018 10:37 am
Last Updated:Mar 18, 2018 8:26 am

To all trump supporters..

I need to ask.. who do you trust besides Trump?

Who do you trust to tell the truth, besides Trump?

With all the firings and resignations.. Is their anyone you think got a raw deal?

A cult is formed when you only have "ONE" friend and everyone else is an enemy..

When that one friend is your ONLY friend...You got a problem with enemy identification...
You can only be "Right" in agreement..
Posted:Mar 13, 2018 8:56 am
Last Updated:Mar 14, 2018 11:35 am

With the ousting of Rex Tillerson..... We have reached the final stage of no room in this administration to agree to disagree

I'm certainly not a defender of Rex Tillerson, Steve Bannon, Rence Priebus, James Comey,and Gary Cohn...It is not in my defense of them that I stand up......I stand up for their right to disagree.....with or without my agreement to it...

We have heard from this President about the finest people in this country to be appointed by him...The best of the best..
When in reality the best of the best.. must be in servitude to the President and NOT the country...Do you expect Trump to come out and say it....To define what he means by "loyalty"...... Like Platitudes of Servitude...Mind readers that need to anticipate the directive, and simply say "how high" when asked to jump. Where truth becomes fiction and fiction becomes truth.....That are willing to buy into an untrue narrative so as to achieve an untrue goal...

Those unwilling... can never make the Right choice... And more important can NEVER be Right. Again the impossibility of possibilities..

But it appears that only Trump is allowed the luxury of making the wrong choices. then convince everybody.. the choice was Right, and just the people were wrong...
Because..... You can only be "Right" agreement with Trump.
Justice Dept. suing California over sanctuary laws, Gov. Brown calls it a 'political stunt'
Posted:Mar 7, 2018 10:58 am
Last Updated:Mar 9, 2018 8:02 am

"California Gov. Jerry Brown has slammed the Trump administration's latest salvo against the Golden State -- the Justice Department announced Tuesday night it is suing to block state laws that extend protections to people living in the U.S. illegally -- claiming it's a move that will "further divide and polarize America."

"At a time of unprecedented political turmoil, Jeff Sessions has come to California to further divide and polarize America," the Democratic lawmaker tweeted.

Then, in a direct shout-out to the attorney general, Brown wrote, "Jeff, these political stunts may be the norm in Washington, but they don’t work here. SAD!!!"

The Federal Government can't do it..So it is just a "political stunt"..

Can't control.. local and State law enforcement, as to the criminality of just being "illegal"
Can't control local and state laws and the governing of the enforcement of those laws.
Can't even deport those who registered for DACA. and legally abide by that registration

the Federal government can't do it... they know they can't do it...Any body with half a brain knows they can't do it...

The hypocrisy of the Right is just amazing... the irony of.... less federal government intervention into State and individuals rights.. and the promotion of more intervention at the same time.
The freedom of individuals, districts and Sates to elect official who represent those individual and district and states.. The promotion of that when it's about religion, Alt-right, conservatism, gender equality, schools, and entitlements..
Yet, when it about sanctuary, Liberalism, voting rights, gender equality, race equality, or law enforcement, those same people don't have the right. It's superseded by the Federal government in power.
Government and business
Posted:Mar 5, 2018 11:12 am
Last Updated:Mar 5, 2018 7:29 pm

I wrote a blog about it..

got some good responses..

but I came up with that defines my idea better than the original.. and wanted people to read it and try to understand it..


What a perfect example Trump is... of a government messing around in business.

When a person controls government and THEN can control their own business.


Do you believe that Kurshner used government to facilitate his business.
Do you believe in the degrading of the "emoluments clause"
Do you believe Trump uses his position to facilitate his own businesses
Do you believe that the specifics of ing a certain business, override ing business in general.
Does the NRA have more power, as gun manufacturers than the farmers.

Even if you don't believe that... You need to believe that Trump see himself as not running a country... but running a business.

It's happening all over the place...

if you do believe.. then this country's capitalism is in a world of hurt......When the business of government becomes a "business".
Capitalism, taxes, regulations, and tariffs
Posted:Mar 4, 2018 2:53 pm
Last Updated:Mar 10, 2018 7:10 am

First, I need to explain something I always think as rhetoric.. This blog is about ideas not about specific, you can find the specifics to derail the ideas.. but even so.. the truth is in the idea not in the specific..

Capitalism is an ideology that supports businesses, the ability and the freedom to do business..The ideas of Communism.. is ability to work and the freedom of the workers.
Although it's certainly not that simple..From an base ideology standpoint it's both true, and in it's actions untrue.. A communist government rhetoric supports the workers and the Capitalist government support the businesses. That's what it says, but that's not what it entirely does. There's this confrontational aspect that governments... cannot be all of either.
That in the communist government, the government becomes the business. In the capitalist government the businesses become the government.

Taxes are the form to pay for government. In the capitalist system.. Taxes are paid based on profits and income... In the Communist system taxes are government profits.
The ideas of equality of taxes based on each system is... the more profits the systems generates the more taxes that are paid..... For the communist system the more work, determines more taxes, and more government profits.
The American has a requirement based on democracy and the Constitution. That prevents the government from becoming a business in itself. Equality of opportunity. the government shall not impede the quality or quantity of opportunity to earn profits. All government actions MUST be applied to businesses equally..

Communism doesn't have that restriction, as the government is the business.
In our Capitalist system government taxes paid by business and individuals become an accepted responsibility.. so they say. Yet, The more profit a company or individual makes the the more unequal their influence. the American businesses become the same as the communist government run business.. No longer a responsibility to govern but the responsibility to run their government,

As long as businesses agree what the government does such as tax cuts, or cutting regulations, benefits businesses as a whole.. They are all for it Workers don't really matter in that case... because each business is it's own government to their worker,, and as they go so go their workers.. , People think they have the power, and the ballot box definitely gives them some.... but businesses have whittle away at the that power.. It's Not "trickle down" economics... but "trickle down" government...As government does stuff that hurts business.. it is "trickle down" blame for the workers to get behind the business.....Loss of jobs aren't business decisions they are government impediments to business.

Anyway this is the "propaganda" of businesses.. It keeps workers in line.. It demand the loyalty, and is used to persuade workers.. That what is to business benefits.. benefits them.

As the communist government as a business.. has the real power... so does the American business have the government.
Posted:Mar 4, 2018 12:02 pm
Last Updated:Mar 6, 2018 11:44 pm

I talk a lot about labels..How they are so unfair......

WE discuss them here. Like their existence is a matter of fact....I Never quite understood that.. until today. what makes a label... a matter of fact...

Today i was thinking of being in junior high school and High school... and how we learned labels, to be a matter of fact. How here at SFF, we are just still in high school..
Although, there wasn't a course offered, what we learned ...was about people.. who and what they are....I haven't forgotten those lessons and have been TRYING to fight them ever since.

Cliques, personalities, looks, the have's and have nots, The "in crowd" and the "left out crowd, the "doers" and the "watchers", And the conformity and non-conformity.
We thought we were doing the right thing. we learned and assimilated a culture of labels.

And so we continue it here... WE label each other, and I doubt a single one. agrees with the label hung on them. There are those who create their own reputation, and there are some that need to created the reputation for others. We ALL go along with it..

We all apply the reputation before we hear the words.. We all read the reputation before we read the words. We all see the reputation before we see the person..
We label the person, the context of their words, and meaning of their ideas..
We listen and accept the lies of those who wish to promote a certain reputation, those who wish to created the label...because it suits US.. It's what we learned in High School.
And if perchance one doesn't choose to believe "them".. then they too, must accept their own lies about it. For you see, whether or not.. You are one of the "haves" or the "have nots".. It works the same in reverse...
Your choice is to go along with it, or go down with them.
Thoughts for the Day
Posted:Feb 28, 2018 9:23 am
Last Updated:Mar 1, 2018 8:22 am

First, I find that Trump supporters are against the rhetoric of the Left, about most issues and the the issue is guns....Yesterday maybe tax cuts.. Tomorrow we will again be confronted with immigration and DACA.. Then we will still have Russian inference and American cooperation with that interference as an issue.

there are two factors in determining the truth of the issues and the news.. First the facts, and the second the conclusions and possibilities arrived at about those facts. One needs to be able to separate the two..

The Russian investigation for example, in itself was a conclusion from facts, originally the Russian interference was not a fact......that has NOW become a fact..
The original conclusion...Were simply rhetoric from the left, based on the facts... as to how they saw them..The pundits from the right, made the rhetoric something different than it was.. With the end result still making the rhetoric non-factual.

When do conclusions become not a possible result....but attack the facts themselves.
When do people believe conclusions from the facts, before the results are known?

Which brings me to the left's rhetoric.. in regards to Trump and the issues.

Facts and conclusions.. well for many of the Trump supporters.. there is a great deal of confusion..The facts of the Left rhetoric, and the different conclusions of what those facts mean..
For the right....It gets turned around and the conclusions become the facts, and the facts of their rhetoric become nonfactual. that's what trump supporters are told.. Because if the Left's conclusion are wrong.. then their facts are wrong. If their conclusion are proven still doesn't mean their facts were right

People who are against the rhetoric of the Left.....don't care about what that rhetoric actually is... they only hear the conclusions of that rhetoric, given by pundits, who support their position.. they hear it..... and those people's conclusions becomes the facts, and the fact become non-factual..

To link to this blog (jiminycricket1) use [blog jiminycricket1] in your messages.